Proposal B for JSON Schema generation #20
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…pdates. Adjusted file associations in VSCode settings.
- Added a new TypeScript file `generate.ts` to handle the generation of JSON schema from a given TypeScript file. The script validates input parameters, generates a UUID, creates the schema configuration, and writes the resulting JSON schema to an output file.
…erfaces. Define properties and types for nodes and edges. Include descriptions for clarity. Create TypeScript interfaces for JsonCanvas, CanvasNode, TextNode, FileNode, LinkNode, GroupNode, AllNodes, and Edge with detailed attributes and types. alternative proposal for obsidianmd#10
Mearman
changed the title
|
I'm definitely a fan of B rather than A. Having typescript types/interfaces with sane names seems a lot more useful. This way not only do we get a JSON schema, we also get typescript types. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
again for solving #10, built more conservatively based on the written spec