Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Describe the difference between notary, TUF, Notary Project specification, and notation in faq.md #323

Closed
Roseline-Bassey opened this issue Jul 24, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #326 or #328

Comments

@Roseline-Bassey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe what is what, what it means, how it works, and how it is different from the others.

@yizha1
Copy link
Contributor

yizha1 commented Jul 25, 2023

@Roseline-Bassey I think this issue was created per notaryproject/.github#35 (comment). The priority is P0, and will you work on this issue?

@Roseline-Bassey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I am working on the issue. @yizha1

@FeynmanZhou
Copy link
Member

@Roseline-Bassey Thanks. These terminologies should be documented in the Glossary chapter.

@Roseline-Bassey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Roseline-Bassey commented Jul 25, 2023

The Glossary folder is included in this PR#312 which is still being reviewed. Should I submit a separate PR to create the glossary.md file? Also, for clarification, would it be necessary to still document the difference between these terminologies in faq.md as well? @FeynmanZhou

@FeynmanZhou
Copy link
Member

The Glossary folder is included in this PR#312 which is still being reviewed. Should I submit a separate PR to create the glossary.md file? Also, for clarification, would it be necessary to still document the difference between these terminologies in faq.md as well? @FeynmanZhou

Let's do it in a separate PR.

priteshbandi pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2023
… specification, and notation (#328)

This PR adds a new section in faq.md to clarify the difference between Notary, Notary v2, Notation, TUF, and Notary Project. It fixes #323 

I haven't included a link to the `glossary page` in the last line because PR #326 is still under review and has not been merged yet. I will update this PR with the link once #326 is merged.

---------

Signed-off-by: Roseline <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yi Zha <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment