Add codeowners #456
Merged
Add codeowners #456
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alanwest
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2023
kaylareopelle
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2023
utr1903
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2023
keegoid-nr
pushed a commit
to keegoid-nr/newrelic-opentelemetry-examples
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This repo has quite a bit of content across many languages and technologies. In order to avoid bit rot, we need to have people who understand the different technologies around for code reviews. Ideally, those folks could also occasionally perform maintenance on the examples, updating any dependencies to the latest version.
I went through and added the folks who contributed the various examples as codeowners. Please accept this invitation 🙂. Of course there's no obligation to be a codeowner. If you prefer to not be included, please indicate with a comment on the PR, and consider suggesting someone else as an alternative.
We may delete examples without codeowners since its better to have no example at all than one that is wildly out of date and inaccurate.