Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

KZG Polynomial Commitment #112

Closed
Tracked by #182
mratsim opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #182

KZG Polynomial Commitment #112

mratsim opened this issue Jan 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement :shipit: New feature or request

Comments

@mratsim
Copy link
Owner

mratsim commented Jan 20, 2021

Eth2 phase 1 is currently exploring Kate Polynomial Commitment at:

We could use constantine as an alternate implementation to get an idea of the overhead involved using Assembly primitives.

@mratsim
Copy link
Owner Author

mratsim commented Jan 20, 2021

From @protolambda

Generally I followed the python code, and implemented the same test cases to run through them step-by-step to compare computations, input sizes, etc. to make sure I didn't get anything different. It's primarily just a lot of data transforms, and although the python code is readable, it didn't translate straightforward to idiomatic Go, so that took some time. The crypto itself is not too bad after that.
Theory:

@mratsim mratsim added the enhancement :shipit: New feature or request label Jan 20, 2021
@mratsim mratsim changed the title Kate Polynomial Commitment KZG Polynomial Commitment Feb 21, 2022
@mratsim mratsim mentioned this issue Feb 21, 2022
3 tasks
@mratsim
Copy link
Owner Author

mratsim commented Aug 13, 2023

Closed by #239

Follow-up in #252

@mratsim mratsim closed this as completed Aug 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement :shipit: New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant