Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

handle invalid std::shared_future reference #15

Closed

Conversation

benmaidel
Copy link

ref: https://github.com/orgs/4am-robotics/projects/1/views/15?pane=issue&itemId=22588163

This more a workaround for the underlying bug in actionlib implementation. actionlib should only call the callback function with the shared_future reference if the shared_future is already valid and can be used. This could be a Foxy bug and may be already fixed in newer ros releases. Have to check that.

hsd-dev and others added 14 commits July 11, 2023 16:53
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Biggs <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Deshpande <[email protected]>
@fmessmer
Copy link
Member

fmessmer commented Sep 21, 2023

@benmaidel
does it make sense to combine #13 and #15?

@benmaidel benmaidel force-pushed the fix/invalid_shared_future branch from 0e13142 to 1ce4564 Compare September 21, 2023 12:57
@benmaidel
Copy link
Author

@benmaidel
does it make sense to combine #13 and #15?

I've rebased this on top of #13 and dropped unnecessary commits.

@fmessmer
Copy link
Member

this is finalized in #13 - together with improved output and passing CI 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants