Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: pod-level security context for datashield and blaze #432

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

chgl
Copy link
Collaborator

@chgl chgl commented Dec 18, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2024

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 5 0 0.14s
✅ BASH bash-exec 3 0 0.49s
✅ BASH shellcheck 3 0 0.16s
✅ BASH shfmt 3 0 0.01s
✅ EDITORCONFIG editorconfig-checker 212 0 0.43s
✅ JSON jsonlint 1 0 2.19s
✅ JSON prettier 1 0 1.94s
✅ MARKDOWN markdownlint 13 0 1.08s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no 25.5s
✅ REPOSITORY dustilock yes no 0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no 1.79s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.02s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no 12.21s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no 1.38s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no 2.22s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no 8.35s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no 0.13s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no 3.39s
✅ YAML prettier 144 0 1.95s
✅ YAML yamllint 144 0 1.54s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

You could have the same capabilities but better runtime performances if you use a MegaLinter flavor:

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@chgl chgl merged commit 75a0fa9 into master Dec 18, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant