Skip to content

Introduce setting to disable annotations for checks #1008

Introduce setting to disable annotations for checks

Introduce setting to disable annotations for checks #1008

Triggered via pull request January 28, 2024 09:07
Status Success
Total duration 1m 49s
Artifacts

codeql-analysis.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: Analyze
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

26 errors and 2 warnings
| test error handling: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/CalcUtilsTest.kt#L27
unexpected exception type thrown; expected:<java.lang.IllegalStateException> but was:<java.lang.IllegalArgumentException>
| require_fail: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/StringUtilsTest.java#L27
Expected: (an instance of java.lang.IllegalArgumentException and exception with message a string containing "This is unexpected") but: exception with message a string containing "This is unexpected" message was "Input='' didn't match condition." Stacktrace was: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Input='' didn't match condition. at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtils.requireNotBlank(StringUtils.java:25) at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtils.requireNotBlank(StringUtils.java:18) at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtilsTest.require_fail(StringUtilsTest.java:27) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:258) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
| require: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/StringUtilsTest.java#L20
java.lang.AssertionError at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtilsTest.require(StringUtilsTest.java:20)
test_sample.test_which_fails: test_results/python/test_sample.py#L10
AssertionError: assert 'test' == 'xyz' - xyz + test
test_sample.test_with_error: test_results/python/test_sample.py#L14
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'attr'
| test error handling: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/CalcUtilsTest.kt#L27
unexpected exception type thrown; expected:<java.lang.IllegalStateException> but was:<java.lang.IllegalArgumentException>
| require_fail: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/StringUtilsTest.java#L27
Expected: (an instance of java.lang.IllegalArgumentException and exception with message a string containing "This is unexpected") but: exception with message a string containing "This is unexpected" message was "Input='' didn't match condition." Stacktrace was: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Input='' didn't match condition. at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtils.requireNotBlank(StringUtils.java:25) at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtils.requireNotBlank(StringUtils.java:18) at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtilsTest.require_fail(StringUtilsTest.java:27) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.rules.ExpectedException$ExpectedExceptionStatement.evaluate(ExpectedException.java:258) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238) at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126) at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
| require: test_results/tests/utils/src/test/java/action/surefire/report/calc/StringUtilsTest.java#L20
java.lang.AssertionError at action.surefire.report.calc.StringUtilsTest.require(StringUtilsTest.java:20)
\n: test_results/python/test_sample.py#L10
AssertionError: assert 'test' == 'xyz' - xyz + test
\n: test_results/python/test_sample.py#L14
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'attr'
Analyze (javascript)
Node.js 16 actions are deprecated. Please update the following actions to use Node.js 20: github/codeql-action/init@v2, github/codeql-action/autobuild@v2, github/codeql-action/analyze@v2. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2023-09-22-github-actions-transitioning-from-node-16-to-node-20/.
Analyze (javascript)
CodeQL Action v2 will be deprecated on December 5th, 2024. Please update all occurrences of the CodeQL Action in your workflow files to v3. For more information, see https://github.blog/changelog/2024-01-12-code-scanning-deprecation-of-codeql-action-v2/