Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

http-client-java, bump typespec libs #5317

Conversation

weidongxu-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft commented Dec 10, 2024

bump for the new typespec versions

  1. bug fix for pagination (when no nextLink)
  2. improvement for unbranded error without body
  3. remove core-json from unbranded, as it recently merged to core

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java label Dec 10, 2024
@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

No changes needing a change description found.

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

You can try these changes here

🛝 Playground 🌐 Website 📚 Next docs

@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft changed the title http-client-java, bump TCGC http-client-java, bump typespec libs Dec 11, 2024
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit ed3cccb Dec 11, 2024
25 checks passed
@weidongxu-microsoft weidongxu-microsoft deleted the http-client-java_bump-cadl-ranch branch December 11, 2024 08:16
archerzz pushed a commit to archerzz/typespec that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2024
bump for the new typespec versions

1. bug fix for pagination (when no `nextLink`)
2. improvement for unbranded error without body
3. remove `core-json` from unbranded, as it recently merged to `core`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
emitter:client:java Issue for the Java client emitter: @typespec/http-client-java
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants