-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug fix in split_index
method
#5292
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@loadams @conglongli what's holding this PR? |
We need the correct folks to review |
loadams
approved these changes
Apr 18, 2024
rraminen
pushed a commit
to ROCm/DeepSpeed
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
Bug description: on a dataset of 20 samples, when running 4 workers with 8 threads per worker, then the `split_dataset` would return for worker id `1`: ``` self.worker_splits [[0, 5], [5, 10], [10, 15], [15, 20]] self.thread_splits [[5, 6], [6, 7], [7, 8], [8, 9], [9, 10], [10, 10], [11, 10], [12, 10]] ``` `thread_splits` is wrong and causes a crash in the `DataAnalyzer`: the end sample id is lower than the initial one on the last 2 threads. This PR fixes that by fixing the behaviour of `split_index` --------- Co-authored-by: Logan Adams <[email protected]>
umchand
pushed a commit
to umchand/DeepSpeed
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
Bug description: on a dataset of 20 samples, when running 4 workers with 8 threads per worker, then the `split_dataset` would return for worker id `1`: ``` self.worker_splits [[0, 5], [5, 10], [10, 15], [15, 20]] self.thread_splits [[5, 6], [6, 7], [7, 8], [8, 9], [9, 10], [10, 10], [11, 10], [12, 10]] ``` `thread_splits` is wrong and causes a crash in the `DataAnalyzer`: the end sample id is lower than the initial one on the last 2 threads. This PR fixes that by fixing the behaviour of `split_index` --------- Co-authored-by: Logan Adams <[email protected]>
dbyoung18
pushed a commit
to dbyoung18/DeepSpeed
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2024
Bug description: on a dataset of 20 samples, when running 4 workers with 8 threads per worker, then the `split_dataset` would return for worker id `1`: ``` self.worker_splits [[0, 5], [5, 10], [10, 15], [15, 20]] self.thread_splits [[5, 6], [6, 7], [7, 8], [8, 9], [9, 10], [10, 10], [11, 10], [12, 10]] ``` `thread_splits` is wrong and causes a crash in the `DataAnalyzer`: the end sample id is lower than the initial one on the last 2 threads. This PR fixes that by fixing the behaviour of `split_index` --------- Co-authored-by: Logan Adams <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bug description: on a dataset of 20 samples, when running 4 workers with 8 threads per worker, then the
split_dataset
would return for worker id1
:thread_splits
is wrong and causes a crash in theDataAnalyzer
: the end sample id is lower than the initial one on the last 2 threads.This PR fixes that by fixing the behaviour of
split_index