Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade metaschema from 2.1.5 to 2.2.0 #1965

Closed

Conversation

tshemsedinov
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade metaschema from 2.1.5 to 2.2.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 21 days ago, on 2024-03-27.
Release notes
Package name: metaschema from metaschema GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: metaschema
  • 464a67f Version 2.2.0
  • 8ea94a7 Update dependencies
  • e50ce30 Add usage example to README
  • 8d20257 Rename `SchemaError` to `ValidationResult`
  • 707b91a Update dependencies to fix browser build
  • 646642b Add browser entry point
  • 2f27c05 Update dependencies
  • d8c474b Disable eslint `no-invalid-this` for empty method
  • d17426b Fix package file: url and format
  • ce11bc4 Add node 21 to CI
  • 38f5409 Drop node.js 16 and 19
  • d0f4610 Update dependencies
  • a2dc43e Convert lockfileVersion 2 to 3
  • eeac141 Remove unnecessary function

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@tshemsedinov
Copy link
Member Author

Close in favour of #1966

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants