Skip to content

Analysis of Different Networks for Sparse Cross-Domain Correspondence

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

mehrdaddarraji/CrossDomainCorrespondence

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Analysis of Different Networks for Sparse Cross-Domain Correspondence

By: Mehrdad Darraji, Jorge Garcia, Adriana Ixba, and Carlos Valdez

I. Description of Problem

For this project, we have gained inspiration from the “Neural Best Buddies: Sparse Cross-Domain Correspondence” paper. We will use different pre-trained networks and datasets to find crossdomain correspondences, and use it for morphing between pets and their owners. The paper defines sparse cross-domain correspondence as “a more general and challenging version of the sparse correspondence problem, where the object of interest in the two input images can differ more drastically in their shape and appearance, such as objects belonging to different semantic categories (domains).”

II. Project Datasets and Software Packages

We are not training any data, we'll be using pre-trained classifiers and testing their performance. For testing the image correspondence, we will compare the Labeled Faces and dogs In the Wild dataset by the University of Massachusetts, Stanford's Dogs dataset, Cifar-100, and a small custom dataset to morph dogs to their owner’s face. The authors of the paper use PyTorch to implement their algorithm. We will also use the PyTorch library to implement the different networks because it has faster deep learning training.

III. Implementation

The paper uses VGG19 pre-trained network to find correspondences between images in the Pascal 3D+ dataset. We will implement the algorithms of the paper on VGG19, ResNet50, and InceptionV3.

IV. Set of Experiments

Run cross-domain correspondences on the general dataset (cifar-100). Run cross-domain correspondences on faces & dogs datasets. Create morphing using images of owners and their dogs from our custom dataset.

V. Measuring Success

We plan to compare and contrast different pre-trained networks to the VGG19 one used on the paper to see which would give the best results for cross-domain correspondence problem and has the ability to morph images the best. We will base our success measures off of how the paper evaluates their results, “visually compare NBB-based key point selection” with other NBB-based key point selections of other networks, we will evaluate our methods on different objects as well as objects of similar categories. We will analyze which network performs the best cross-domain correspondences.

About

Analysis of Different Networks for Sparse Cross-Domain Correspondence

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 3

  •  
  •  
  •  

Languages