Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Reword intro
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
oliverbarnes committed Jun 17, 2024
1 parent 765532b commit 5320cc7
Showing 1 changed file with 13 additions and 7 deletions.
20 changes: 13 additions & 7 deletions src/posts/2024-05-21-team-buy-in.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,17 +15,16 @@ image: "/assets/images/posts/2024-05-21-team-buy-in/header-visual.jpeg"
imageAlt: "A rocket icon on a grey image background"
---

Consultants get a bad rep sometimes, and often for good reason, specially due to powerful top tier consultancies involved in everything from privatization of public companies to disaster relief. They're everywhere these days.
"Ugh, leadership is bringing in a bunch of consultants from Evil Co to audit the team and point out our inefficiencies… this can't be good, right?"

Boutique, technical consultancies like Mainmatter are nothing like that, but still "consultant" is a title with plenty of loaded meanings and associations.
Consultants get a bad rep sometimes, and often for good reason, specially due to powerful top tier consultancies involved in
everything from privatization of public companies to disaster relief. They're everywhere these days.

As our Engineering Manager, [Kevin Bongart](https://github.com/KevinBongart), puts it eloquently, the perception can be like:
Software engineering consultancies like Mainmatter are nothing like that, but still "consultant" is a title with plenty of loaded meanings and associations.

"Ugh, leadership is bringing in a bunch of consultants from Big Co to audit the team and point out our inefficiencies… this can't be good, right?"
In the in-house team's view, consultants are often bad news: audits, inefficiencies, and changes suggested by _outsiders_! The natural reaction is to resist opening up, and then implementation of adjustments, even positive ones.

In the team's view, consultants are bad news: audits, inefficiencies, and changes suggested by _outsiders_! The natural reaction is to resist the implementation of all adjustments, even positive ones.

The team would need a very good reason to be on board. And that's called team buy-in.
The team needs a very good reason to be on board.

## Making sure we're welcome guests

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -77,6 +76,13 @@ That's a very bad start for a long term relationship.

Hence, Mainmatter doesn't do audits. We offer blameless assessments as a resource to help teams plan their future work, possibly leading us to a fruitful collaboration down the line.

TODO: add concrete examples of where the assessment can help the team

- provide more budget or people, better tooling
- help push through a team's long standing priorities
- help decide on competing priorities
-


### Collaboration, not intervention

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5320cc7

Please sign in to comment.