feat: add dual licensing fix #5 #14
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update involves a transition in licensing for both software and data components. The software license has been shifted from Apache-2.0 to AGPL-3.0, enhancing the requirements for sharing modifications when the software is run over a network. Additionally, the GNU Affero General Public License version 3.0 has been introduced, emphasizing community cooperation and source code accessibility. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (1)
Additional Context UsedLanguageTool (26)
Additional comments not posted (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Small detail: I think the license badge at the top of
When you click on the "License" tab of the Readme as displayed in a browser, it will also only show one license (apparently sorted in alphabetical order). |
Thanks for pointing this out. I like the automatic badges but they do indeed not work with multiple licenses... Let's check out, how the badges play together with quarto as most projects using this hopefully will deploy a page instead of the readme. @coderabbitai can you create an issue using this template name: 🛠️ Request New Feature
description: Let us know what we should add.
labels: ['feature request']
body:
- type: textarea
id: description
attributes:
label: Describe what feature you'd like. Pseudo-code, mockups, or screenshots of similar solutions are encouraged!
- type: dropdown
id: category
attributes:
label: What type of pull request would this be?
options:
- 'New Feature'
- 'Enhancement'
- 'Guide'
- 'Docs'
- 'Other'
- type: textarea
id: references
attributes:
label: Any links to similar examples or other references we should review? |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @maehr, it seems there was an issue with creating the GitHub issue due to the label 'feature request' not being found in the repository. Would you like me to try creating the issue again without the label, or would you prefer to add the label to your repository first and then proceed with the issue creation? Please let me know how you'd like to proceed! Analysis chainOnce the issue is created, I will provide the URL to the user, confirming the action has been completed. Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Create a new GitHub issue using the provided template
gh issue create --title "🛠️ Request New Feature" --body "Describe what feature you'd like. Pseudo-code, mockups, or screenshots of similar solutions are encouraged!\n\nWhat type of pull request would this be?\n- 'New Feature'\n- 'Enhancement'\n- 'Guide'\n- 'Docs'\n- 'Other'\n\nAny links to similar examples or other references we should review?" --label "feature request"
Length of output: 457 |
|
@coderabbitai Create one without the label |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @maehr, the GitHub issue has been successfully created without the label. You can view and manage the issue here: GitHub Issue #16. If there's anything else you need, feel free to let me know! Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Create a new GitHub issue using the provided template without the label
gh issue create --title "🛠️ Request New Feature" --body "Describe what feature you'd like. Pseudo-code, mockups, or screenshots of similar solutions are encouraged!\n\nWhat type of pull request would this be?\n- 'New Feature'\n- 'Enhancement'\n- 'Guide'\n- 'Docs'\n- 'Other'\n\nAny links to similar examples or other references we should review?"
Length of output: 445 |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @maehr, the GitHub issue has been successfully created without the label. You can view and manage the issue here: GitHub Issue #17. If there's anything else you need, feel free to let me know! Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Create a new GitHub issue using the provided template without labels
gh issue create --title "🛠️ Request New Feature" --body "Describe what feature you'd like. Pseudo-code, mockups, or screenshots of similar solutions are encouraged!\n\nWhat type of pull request would this be?\n- 'New Feature'\n- 'Enhancement'\n- 'Guide'\n- 'Docs'\n- 'Other'\n\nAny links to similar examples or other references we should review?" --label ""
Length of output: 456 |
|
@coderabbitai Sorry for not being sufficiently explicit. Please change the issue such that it becomes a feature request for two badges as proposed by @mtwente
|
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @maehr, the GitHub issue has been successfully updated to reflect the feature request for adding two specific license badges as proposed by @mtwente. You can view and manage the updated issue here: GitHub Issue #17. If there's anything else you need, please let me know! Analysis chainOnce the script is executed and the issue is updated, I will inform the user about the completion of the task. Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Update the GitHub issue with the new feature request for dual badges
gh issue edit 17 --body "Feature request for adding two specific license badges to README.md and README.template.md as proposed by @mtwente. The badges are as follows:
 
This change addresses the issue of displaying multiple licenses on GitHub's 'License' tab, which currently only shows one license sorted alphabetically. The addition of these badges to the README files will visually represent the dual licensing directly in the project documentation."
Length of output: 964 |
Pull request
Proposed changes
Types of changes
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit