-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[da-vinci][dvc] Dropping unassigned partitions #1332
Draft
kristyelee
wants to merge
20
commits into
linkedin:main
Choose a base branch
from
kristyelee:kristy_lee/650_davinci
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
+113
−10
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kristyelee
commented
Nov 26, 2024
clients/da-vinci-client/src/main/java/com/linkedin/davinci/StoreBackend.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kvargha
reviewed
Dec 4, 2024
clients/da-vinci-client/src/main/java/com/linkedin/davinci/DaVinciBackend.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kristyelee
force-pushed
the
kristy_lee/650_davinci
branch
from
December 5, 2024 01:08
2055b04
to
52a557c
Compare
kristyelee
force-pushed
the
kristy_lee/650_davinci
branch
from
December 9, 2024 18:32
b94b49a
to
262bbc6
Compare
…iption. Enabled config flag over bootstrap subscription
…iption. Enabled config flag over bootstrap subscription
kvargha
reviewed
Dec 10, 2024
clients/da-vinci-client/src/main/java/com/linkedin/davinci/DaVinciBackend.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
internal/venice-common/src/main/java/com/linkedin/venice/ConfigKeys.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kristyelee
force-pushed
the
kristy_lee/650_davinci
branch
from
December 10, 2024 23:45
a163e56
to
9dbffc9
Compare
…cally. Integration Test [In Writing]
kristyelee
force-pushed
the
kristy_lee/650_davinci
branch
from
December 11, 2024 00:59
9dbffc9
to
fd9fa02
Compare
…cally. Integration Test [In Writing]
kvargha
reviewed
Dec 13, 2024
@@ -1283,6 +1283,94 @@ public void testBootstrap(DaVinciConfig daVinciConfig) throws Exception { | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Test(timeOut = TEST_TIMEOUT, dataProvider = "dv-client-config-provider", dataProviderClass = DataProviderUtils.class) | |||
public void testBootstrapSubscription(DaVinciConfig clientConfig) throws Exception { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since DA_VINCI_SUBSCRIBE_ON_DISK_PARTITIONS_AUTOMATICALLY
is already true by default, we should instead write a test where it's set to false.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary, imperative, start upper case, don't end with a period
The objective is to remove unassigned partitions.
Applying this issue to Da Vinci Client which has information over partitions in storage.
This PR is an extension of the PR #1196 [https://github.com//pull/1196] that checks which partitions should be kept [in
StorageService
] and applies the check inVeniceServer
.Resolves #650
How was this PR tested?
A corresponding test will be written.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing changes?