-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Keysend is a basic form of spontaneous (invoice-less) payments. It is already supported by all major implementations, but was never publicly specified.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
e169d45
commit 44434a9
Showing
3 changed files
with
102 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ | ||
``` | ||
bLIP: 3 | ||
Title: Keysend | ||
Status: Active | ||
Author: Valentine Wallace <[email protected]> | ||
Created: 2021-12-08 | ||
License: CC0 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
# Abstract | ||
|
||
Keysend is a type of lightning payment that does not require the payee to | ||
provide an invoice. Instead, the payer includes their payer-selected payment | ||
preimage in the TLV onion. | ||
|
||
This bLIP serves to document what is already well-supported in the wild (see | ||
[Reference Implementations](#reference-implementations)), for posterity and so | ||
that new implementations don't have to reverse-engineer keysend from existing | ||
implementations. | ||
|
||
# Copyright | ||
|
||
This bLIP is licensed under the CC0 license. | ||
|
||
# Specification | ||
|
||
Sender: | ||
* MUST include a TLV record keyed by type `5482373484` with a TLV value of a | ||
randomly generated and cryptographically-secure 32-byte value that serves as | ||
the HTLC payment preimage | ||
* MUST NOT reuse a previously used preimage | ||
* MUST NOT reuse a preimage from a previously paid invoice | ||
* MUST set the `payment_hash` field in the `update_add_htlc` message to match | ||
the SHA256 hash of the payment preimage | ||
* SHOULD only send payments to nodes advertising the `keysend` feature bit | ||
|
||
Receiver: | ||
* if failing the payment due to not wanting to accept keysend payments or if | ||
the preimage does not match the payment hash, SHOULD error with | ||
`PERM|15 incorrect_or_unknown_payment_details`. | ||
|
||
# Motivation | ||
|
||
A convenience of layer 1 bitcoin is being able to spontaneously send to a | ||
bitcoin address with no advance work required on the part of the payee. Keysend | ||
brings the convenience of sponaneous payments to layer 2 (with a few caveats, | ||
see the [Drawbacks](#keysend-drawbacks) section). | ||
|
||
As previously mentioned, keysend also has the advantage of already being | ||
supported by major implementations. So regardless of whether it is the best | ||
solution to spontaneous payments, it's a good idea to have some form of | ||
official documentation for it. | ||
|
||
# Rationale | ||
|
||
Design decisions for keysend were largely made by the original lnd keysend | ||
implementation (e.g. the choice of `5482373484` for the TLV type). | ||
|
||
* The TLV type `5482373484` was chosen at random | ||
* The rationale behind having a feature bit is that it's nicer to opt-in to | ||
receiving keysend payments: without a feature bit, the only way for senders to | ||
explicitly know that receivers support keysend is by attempting a keysend | ||
payment and seeing whether or not it fails. | ||
|
||
# Keysend Drawbacks | ||
|
||
* Inability for the payee to specify their preferred `min_final_cltv_expiry`. | ||
This is an issue because payer and payee may have differing security | ||
requirements, which could lead to payment failures if the payee considers the | ||
payer's choice of `min_final_cltv_expiry` too high or too low. | ||
* Loss of being able to use the preimage and invoice signature as | ||
proof-of-payment. With regular lightning payments, payers are able to use (1) | ||
the payment preimage and (2) the invoice signature in a situation where they | ||
need to prove that they made a payment (the invoice signature is necessary to | ||
prove that the payer was not an intermediary hop). This proof cannot be | ||
provided for keysend payments because the preimage is provided by the payer to | ||
begin with and no invoice is being paid. | ||
* Keysend is expected to be deprecated in favor of a more well-developed | ||
spontaneous payment solution like | ||
[Offers](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/798) or | ||
[AMP](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/pull/658) | ||
|
||
# Reference Implementations | ||
|
||
LDK: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-lightning/pull/967 | ||
|
||
C-Lightning: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/blob/master/plugins/keysend.c | ||
|
||
lnd original keysend PR: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/3795 | ||
|
||
Eclair: https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair/pull/1485 |