-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: results on inner regularity of finite measures #19780
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
PR summary d541b6c223Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
The PR text is a little bit misleading, as it's not true in general that a finite measure is inner regular wrt compact sets in an emetric space: you need completeness and second countability assumptions (i.e., a polish space), right? Can you adjust the PR text, and the docstring in the file? I'm also a little bit confused by the fact that the author of the PR is not mentioned as one of the authors of the main file. Can you explain what is going on here? And thanks for PRing this, this is an important result that should definitely be in mathlib! |
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
The file is originally fom https://github.com/RemyDegenne/kolmogorov_extension4, which isn't a pull request yet. I copied the needed file with the permission of Peter Pfaffelhuber in order to proceed the work on separation of finite measures, #19782. |
|
||
/-- | ||
If predicate `p` is preserved under intersections with sets satisfying predicate `q`, and sets | ||
satisfying `p` exploit the space arbitrarily well, then `μ` is inner regular with respect to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
satisfying `p` exploit the space arbitrarily well, then `μ` is inner regular with respect to | |
satisfying `p` cover the space arbitrarily well, then `μ` is inner regular with respect to |
`SecondCountableTopology E` is inner regular. In other words, a finite measure | ||
on such a space is a tight measure. | ||
-/ | ||
theorem InnerRegular_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one should be an instance. For the main properties (Regular
, InnerRegular
, InnerRegularCompactLTTop
), registering these as instances makes sure that typeclass inference will find it for you for free. For instance, once you register this one as an instance, then Mathlib also knows automatically that such a measure if regular!
It would also be a good idea to register the corresponding instance on a polish space (because the current one won't apply, as a polish space is not a PseudoEmetricSpace).
A measure `μ` on a `PseudoEMetricSpace E` and `CompleteSpace E` with | ||
`SecondCountableTopology E` is inner regular for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets. | ||
-/ | ||
theorem InnerRegularCompactLTTop_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one should also be an instance. And please also register the Polish space version as an instance.
in a
PseudoEMetricSpace
andCompleteSpace
withSecondCountableTopology
, any finite measure is inner regular with respect to compact sets. In other words, finite measures are tight. Important result in probability