Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: results on inner regularity of finite measures #19780

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JakobStiefel
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel commented Dec 7, 2024

in a PseudoEMetricSpace and CompleteSpace with SecondCountableTopology, any finite measure is inner regular with respect to compact sets. In other words, finite measures are tight. Important result in probability


Open in Gitpod

@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel added the t-measure-probability Measure theory / Probability theory label Dec 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the new-contributor This PR was made by a contributor with at most 5 merged PRs. Welcome to the community! label Dec 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 7, 2024

PR summary d541b6c223

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference
Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.RegularityCompacts (new file) 1365

Declarations diff

+ InnerRegularCompactLTTop_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable
+ InnerRegular_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable
+ PolishSpace.innerRegular_isCompact_isClosed_measurableSet
+ exists_isCompact_closure_measure_compl_lt
+ exists_measure_iInter_lt
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_closure
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_closure_iff
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_closure_of_univ
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_isClosed
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_isClosed_iff
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_isClosed_iff_innerRegularWRT_isCompact_closure
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_isClosed_isOpen
+ innerRegularWRT_isCompact_isOpen
+ innerRegularWRT_of_exists_compl_lt
+ innerRegular_isCompact_isClosed_measurableSet_of_finite
+ interUnionBalls
+ isCompact_closure_interUnionBalls
+ tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_le_of_antitone
+ tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
+ totallyBounded_interUnionBalls

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


No changes to technical debt.

You can run this locally as

./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
  • The relative value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic.
  • The absolute value is the relative value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).

@sgouezel
Copy link
Contributor

sgouezel commented Dec 8, 2024

The PR text is a little bit misleading, as it's not true in general that a finite measure is inner regular wrt compact sets in an emetric space: you need completeness and second countability assumptions (i.e., a polish space), right? Can you adjust the PR text, and the docstring in the file?

I'm also a little bit confused by the fact that the author of the PR is not mentioned as one of the authors of the main file. Can you explain what is going on here?

And thanks for PRing this, this is an important result that should definitely be in mathlib!

@sgouezel sgouezel added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 8, 2024
@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel changed the title feat: inner regularity of finite measures wrt compact sets feat: results on inner regularity of finite measures Dec 10, 2024
JakobStiefel and others added 3 commits December 10, 2024 12:08
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@JakobStiefel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm also a little bit confused by the fact that the author of the PR is not mentioned as one of the authors of the main file. Can you explain what is going on here?

The file is originally fom https://github.com/RemyDegenne/kolmogorov_extension4, which isn't a pull request yet. I copied the needed file with the permission of Peter Pfaffelhuber in order to proceed the work on separation of finite measures, #19782.

@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel removed the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 10, 2024
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/RegularityCompacts.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sgouezel sgouezel added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 11, 2024
@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel removed the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 18, 2024
@sgouezel sgouezel added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 18, 2024
@JakobStiefel JakobStiefel removed the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Dec 18, 2024

/--
If predicate `p` is preserved under intersections with sets satisfying predicate `q`, and sets
satisfying `p` exploit the space arbitrarily well, then `μ` is inner regular with respect to
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
satisfying `p` exploit the space arbitrarily well, then ` is inner regular with respect to
satisfying `p` cover the space arbitrarily well, then ` is inner regular with respect to

`SecondCountableTopology E` is inner regular. In other words, a finite measure
on such a space is a tight measure.
-/
theorem InnerRegular_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable [PseudoEMetricSpace α]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one should be an instance. For the main properties (Regular, InnerRegular, InnerRegularCompactLTTop), registering these as instances makes sure that typeclass inference will find it for you for free. For instance, once you register this one as an instance, then Mathlib also knows automatically that such a measure if regular!

It would also be a good idea to register the corresponding instance on a polish space (because the current one won't apply, as a polish space is not a PseudoEmetricSpace).

A measure `μ` on a `PseudoEMetricSpace E` and `CompleteSpace E` with
`SecondCountableTopology E` is inner regular for finite measure sets with respect to compact sets.
-/
theorem InnerRegularCompactLTTop_of_pseudoEMetricSpace_completeSpace_secondCountable
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one should also be an instance. And please also register the Polish space version as an instance.

@sgouezel sgouezel added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes new-contributor This PR was made by a contributor with at most 5 merged PRs. Welcome to the community! t-measure-probability Measure theory / Probability theory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants