-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore(Algebra/Category/ModuleCat): rename ModuleCat.asHom
to ModuleCat.ofHom
#19705
Conversation
…eCat.ofHom` It seems the choice between `ofHom` and `asHom` is somewhat inconsistent in concrete categories, but `ofHom` wins. In particular, we want to be consistent with the newly refactored `AlgebraCat.ofHom` and the constructor for objects `ModuleCat.of`. I have not touched `asHomLeft` and `asHomRight` since #19511 will replace these with `ofHom` everywhere anyway. As discussed in the comments for #19511.
PR summary 59c35b0017Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diffNo declarations were harmed in the making of this PR! 🐙 You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit> The doc-module for No changes to technical debt.You can run this locally as
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
maintainer merge
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by chrisflav. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 🎉
bors merge
…eCat.ofHom` (#19705) As discussed in the comments for #19511. It seems the choice between `ofHom` and `asHom` is somewhat inconsistent in concrete categories, but `ofHom` wins. In particular, we want to be consistent with the newly refactored `AlgebraCat.ofHom` and the constructor for objects `ModuleCat.of`. The choice between `asHom` and `ofHom` was only made a few months ago: #17476. It's a bit unfortunate to go back on something that was deprecated so recently, but I think the result is worth the pain. I have not touched `asHomLeft` and `asHomRight` since #19511 will replace these with `ofHom` everywhere anyway.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
ModuleCat.asHom
to ModuleCat.ofHom
ModuleCat.asHom
to ModuleCat.ofHom
As discussed in the comments for #19511.
It seems the choice between
ofHom
andasHom
is somewhat inconsistent in concrete categories, butofHom
wins. In particular, we want to be consistent with the newly refactoredAlgebraCat.ofHom
and the constructor for objectsModuleCat.of
.The choice between
asHom
andofHom
was only made a few months ago: #17476. It's a bit unfortunate to go back on something that was deprecated so recently, but I think the result is worth the pain.I have not touched
asHomLeft
andasHomRight
since #19511 will replace these withofHom
everywhere anyway.