Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect unsecured connections to vSphere #656

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2023

Conversation

liranr23
Copy link
Member

The client to vSphere didn't respect the value to use insecure connections. Now, it will be taken out from the secret and will be respected.

The client to vSphere didn't respect the value to use insecure
connections. Now, it will be taken out from the secret and will be
respected.

Signed-off-by: Liran Rotenberg <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 19, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
6.8% 6.8% Duplication

@liranr23 liranr23 merged commit 9b412a2 into kubev2v:main Nov 20, 2023
11 checks passed
@liranr23 liranr23 deleted the vsphere_tls branch November 20, 2023 14:54
ahadas added a commit to ahadas/forklift that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2024
Currently, all validations fail because we cannot access the hosts with
secure connections. In kubev2v#656 the
code has changed to take the configuration of the client connection from
the secret, however, the secret of the ESXi hosts is never set with the
insecure flag.

This change practically makes the client to the hosts be always
insecure. It's not that significant because the data we get from the
host does not include data that could be confidential.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <[email protected]>
ahadas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Currently, all validations fail because we cannot access the hosts with
secure connections. In #656 the
code has changed to take the configuration of the client connection from
the secret, however, the secret of the ESXi hosts is never set with the
insecure flag.

This change practically makes the client to the hosts be always
insecure. It's not that significant because the data we get from the
host does not include data that could be confidential.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <[email protected]>
ahadas added a commit to ahadas/forklift that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Currently, all validations fail because we cannot access the hosts with
secure connections. In kubev2v#656 the
code has changed to take the configuration of the client connection from
the secret, however, the secret of the ESXi hosts is never set with the
insecure flag.

This change practically makes the client to the hosts be always
insecure. It's not that significant because the data we get from the
host does not include data that could be confidential.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <[email protected]>
ahadas added a commit to ahadas/forklift that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Currently, all validations fail because we cannot access the hosts with
secure connections. In kubev2v#656 the
code has changed to take the configuration of the client connection from
the secret, however, the secret of the ESXi hosts is never set with the
insecure flag.

This change practically makes the client to the hosts be always
insecure. It's not that significant because the data we get from the
host does not include data that could be confidential.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <[email protected]>
ahadas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Currently, all validations fail because we cannot access the hosts with
secure connections. In #656 the
code has changed to take the configuration of the client connection from
the secret, however, the secret of the ESXi hosts is never set with the
insecure flag.

This change practically makes the client to the hosts be always
insecure. It's not that significant because the data we get from the
host does not include data that could be confidential.

Signed-off-by: Arik Hadas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants