Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding image-tag to annotations #184

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

Adding image-tag to annotations #184

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

dwertent
Copy link

@dwertent dwertent commented Jan 29, 2024

User description

Overview


Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Added a condition in relevancy_manager.go to check if the instance type matches the container type.
  • In syft_handler.go, ImageTagMetadataKey was added to annotations and annotations were updated with the correct imageID and imageTag.
  • A new utility function ToInstanceType was added in utils.go to convert container type to instance type.
  • The kubescape/k8s-interface dependency version was updated in go.mod and its checksum was updated in go.sum.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
relevancy_manager.go
Enhanced instance type check in relevancy manager                               

pkg/relevancymanager/v1/relevancy_manager.go

  • Added a condition to check if the instance type matches the container
    type.
+3/-0     
syft_handler.go
Added image tag to SBOM annotations and updated imageID                   

pkg/sbomhandler/syfthandler/syft_handler.go

  • Added ImageTagMetadataKey to annotations.
  • Updated annotations with the correct imageID and imageTag.
+5/-0     
utils.go
Added utility function to convert container type to instance type

pkg/utils/utils.go

  • Added a function ToInstanceType to convert container type to
    instance type.
+14/-0   
Dependencies
go.mod
Updated k8s-interface dependency version                                                 

go.mod

  • Updated the version of kubescape/k8s-interface dependency.
+1/-1     
go.sum
Updated k8s-interface dependency checksum                                               

go.sum

  • Updated the checksum for kubescape/k8s-interface dependency.
+2/-2     

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation
  • When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" 
                         "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]

meaning the describe tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description.

  • Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set:
pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]

the tool will replace every marker of the form pr_agent:marker_name in the PR description with the relevant content, where marker_name is one of the following:

  • type: the PR type.
  • summary: the PR summary.
  • walkthrough: the PR walkthrough.

Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.

Custom labels

The default labels of the describe tool are quite generic: [Bug fix, Tests, Enhancement, Documentation, Other].

If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases.
Examples for custom labels:

  • Main topic:performance - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance
  • New endpoint - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR
  • SQL query - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR
  • Dockerfile changes - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile
  • ...

The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases.
Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories.
Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.

Inline File Walkthrough 💎

For enhanced user experience, the describe tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page.
This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs).

To enable inline file summary, set pr_description.inline_file_summary in the configuration file, possible values are:

  • 'table': File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab.
  • true: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR.
  • false (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.
Utilizing extra instructions

The describe tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_description] 
extra_instructions="""
- The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>'
- The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words)
- ...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 29, 2024
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (d76db40)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: The main theme of this PR is to enhance the functionality of the application by adding image-tag to annotations.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces an enhancement to the application by adding image-tag to annotations. It includes changes in three files: relevancy_manager.go, syft_handler.go, and utils.go. The changes involve adding conditions to check if the instance type matches the container type, updating annotations with the correct imageID and imageTag, and adding a new utility function to convert container type to instance type. The PR also updates the version of the 'kubescape/k8s-interface' dependency in go.mod and its checksum in go.sum.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple files and includes logic changes. However, the changes are straightforward and well-explained, which should make the review process easier.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The code changes in the PR seem to be well-implemented and follow good coding practices. However, it would be beneficial to add some unit tests to verify the new functionality. This will ensure that the changes work as expected and do not introduce any regressions. Additionally, it would be helpful to add comments to the new utility function and other complex parts of the code to improve readability and maintainability.


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'general suggestions' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions                                                                                                                                                         
performance
Optimize the loop by breaking once the matching instanceID is found.         

The loop in lines 139-144 can be optimized by breaking the loop once the matching
instanceID is found. This will prevent unnecessary iterations over the instanceIDs
slice.

pkg/relevancymanager/v1/relevancy_manager.go [139-144]

 for i := range instanceIDs {
     if instanceIDs[i].GetInstanceType() != utils.ToInstanceType(watchedContainer.ContainerType) {
         continue
     }
     if instanceIDs[i].GetContainerName() == containerName {
         instanceID = instanceIDs[i]
+        break
     }
 }
 
possible issue
Handle unsupported ContainerType in ToInstanceType function.

The ToInstanceType function currently returns containerinstance.InstanceType as a
default value. It would be better to handle the default case explicitly and return an
error if an unsupported ContainerType is provided.

pkg/utils/utils.go [212-221]

-func ToInstanceType(c ContainerType) helpersv1.InstanceType {
+func ToInstanceType(c ContainerType) (helpersv1.InstanceType, error) {
     switch c {
     case Container:
-        return containerinstance.InstanceType
+        return containerinstance.InstanceType, nil
     case InitContainer:
-        return initcontainerinstance.InstanceType
+        return initcontainerinstance.InstanceType, nil
+    default:
+        return "", fmt.Errorf("unsupported container type: %v", c)
     }
-    // FIXME: support EphemeralContainer
-    return containerinstance.InstanceType
 }
 
best practice
Ensure the Annotations map is initialized before setting values.

The ImageID and ImageTag are being set in the Annotations map without checking if
the map is initialized. It's a good practice to ensure the map is not nil before setting
values.

pkg/sbomhandler/syfthandler/syft_handler.go [94-95]

 // update annotations with the correct imageID
+if filteredSBOM.Annotations == nil {
+    filteredSBOM.Annotations = make(map[string]string)
+}
 filteredSBOM.Annotations[helpersv1.ImageIDMetadataKey] = watchedContainer.ImageID
 filteredSBOM.Annotations[helpersv1.ImageTagMetadataKey] = watchedContainer.ImageTag
 
enhancement
Run tests after updating the version of github.com/kubescape/k8s-interface.

The version of github.com/kubescape/k8s-interface has been updated. It's recommended to
run tests to ensure that the new version doesn't introduce any breaking changes.

go.mod [19]

-github.com/kubescape/k8s-interface v0.0.159-0.20240128085543-a829d861c684
+// No code changes, just a suggestion to run tests.
 

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Enabling\disabling automation

When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]

meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

Utilizing extra instructions

Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
extra_instructions="""
Emphasize the following aspects:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

A note on code suggestions quality
  • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
  • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
  • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
  • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

matthyx
matthyx previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: David Wertenteil <[email protected]>
@dwertent dwertent merged commit cc1642e into main Feb 1, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@dwertent dwertent deleted the feat/annotatiosn branch February 1, 2024 16:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants