Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding dockerfile chnages + host-scanner deployment #158

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

yuleib
Copy link

@yuleib yuleib commented Dec 17, 2023

Type

Enhancement, Configuration changes


Description

This PR introduces significant changes to the Dockerfile and adds a deployment configuration for the host-scanner. The main changes include:

  • The Dockerfile has been restructured into multiple stages, including a builder stage and a final stage.
  • The Dockerfile now builds two applications: node-agent and kube-host-sensor.
  • The entrypoint for the Dockerfile has been adjusted to run the node-agent.
  • A new deployment configuration for the host-scanner has been added. This configuration deploys the host-scanner as a DaemonSet in the 'kubescape' namespace.

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Configuration changes
2 files
Dockerfile                                                                                                   
    build/Dockerfile

    The Dockerfile has been restructured into multiple stages,
    including a builder stage and a final stage. It now builds
    two applications: node-agent and kube-host-sensor. The
    entrypoint has been adjusted to run the node-agent.
+21/-1
host-scanner.yaml                                                                                     
    deployment/host-scanner.yaml

    A new deployment configuration for the host-scanner has been
    added. This configuration deploys the host-scanner as a
    DaemonSet in the 'kubescape' namespace.
+75/-0

User description

Overview

@codiumai-pr-agent-free codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 17, 2023
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (136d230)

Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Dockerfile restructuring and host-scanner deployment configuration
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces significant changes to the Dockerfile, restructuring it into multiple stages and building two applications. It also adjusts the Dockerfile's entrypoint to run the node-agent. Additionally, a new deployment configuration for the host-scanner is added, deploying it as a DaemonSet in the 'kubescape' namespace.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR involves significant changes to the Dockerfile and introduces a new deployment configuration, which requires a thorough review to ensure everything is correctly set up.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: Yes, because the container in the DaemonSet is running with high privileges, which could be a potential security risk.

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the changes are clearly explained. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to verify the functionality of the new Dockerfile and deployment configuration. Additionally, it would be helpful to provide more context on why these changes are necessary and how they improve the project.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:
    relevant filebuild/Dockerfile
    suggestion      Consider adding a health check command in the Dockerfile to ensure that the applications are running correctly. This can be done using the HEALTHCHECK instruction. [medium]
    relevant lineENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/node-agent"]

    relevant filedeployment/host-scanner.yaml
    suggestion      The container in the DaemonSet is running with high privileges (allowPrivilegeEscalation: true, privileged: true). This could be a potential security risk. If possible, consider reducing the privileges of the container. [important]
    relevant lineallowPrivilegeEscalation: true

    relevant filedeployment/host-scanner.yaml
    suggestion      The resources limits and requests seem to be quite low for the container. Ensure that these values are sufficient for the workload of the host-scanner. [medium]
    relevant linecpu: 0.1m

    relevant filebuild/Dockerfile
    suggestion      It seems that both applications are being built from the same source code (COPY . /work/node-agent and COPY . /work/kube-host-sensor). If these are different applications, they should have their own source code. [important]
    relevant lineCOPY . /work/node-agent

How to use

Instructions

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
/describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
/add_docs: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
/generate_labels: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
see the tools guide for more details.

To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: success
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: success
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: success
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: success
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: success
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

}
if bytes.HasSuffix(processNameFromCMD, []byte(processSuffix)) {
logger.L().Debug("process found", helpers.String("processSuffix", processSuffix),
helpers.Int("pid", int(pid)))

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Incorrect conversion between integer types High

Incorrect conversion of a signed 64-bit integer from
strconv.ParseInt
to a lower bit size type int without an upper bound check.
if bytes.HasSuffix(processNameFromCMD, []byte(processSuffix)) {
logger.L().Debug("process found", helpers.String("processSuffix", processSuffix),
helpers.Int("pid", int(pid)))
res := &ProcessDetails{PID: int32(pid), CmdLine: make([]string, 0, len(cmdLineSplitted))}

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Incorrect conversion between integer types High

Incorrect conversion of a signed 64-bit integer from
strconv.ParseInt
to a lower bit size type int32 without an upper bound check.
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: success
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: success
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: failure

@matthyx matthyx closed this Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants