feat(web): use-atlas-spam-api #1789
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new custom React hook, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-neo ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
❌ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-testnet-devtools failed. Why did it fail? →
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
web/src/hooks/useSpamEvidence.ts(1 hunks)web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx(3 hunks)web/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx
[error] 102-102: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/tsconfig.json (1)
71-71: LGTM
Adding "dom" to the lib array is appropriate to include DOM-related types.
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2-university ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit 01be41e and detected 2 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (3)
83-83: Consider adding error handling for the spam evidence API callThe hook usage should handle potential API failures to ensure graceful degradation.
- const { data: spamEvidences } = useSpamEvidence(); + const { data: spamEvidences, error: spamError } = useSpamEvidence(); + if (spamError) { + console.error('Failed to fetch spam evidence:', spamError); + // Fallback to treating all evidence as non-spam + }
98-108: Consider simplifying the spam evidence processingWhile the current implementation avoids the O(n²) spread operator issue, it could be further simplified for better readability.
const flattenedSpamEvidences = useMemo( () => - spamEvidences?.courtv2EvidenceSpamsByDeployment.reduce<string[]>((acc, current) => { - if (current.dispute === id) { - acc.push(current.disputeEvidenceIndex); - return acc; - } - return acc; - }, []), + spamEvidences?.courtv2EvidenceSpamsByDeployment + .filter(current => current.dispute === id) + .map(current => current.disputeEvidenceIndex), [id, spamEvidences] );
117-122: Consider optimizing the evidence filtering logicWhile the current implementation is correct, it could be optimized to avoid unnecessary array iterations.
const evidences = useMemo(() => { if (!data?.evidences) return; + // Single pass through the array instead of two filter operations + const { spam, real } = data.evidences.reduce( + (acc, evidence) => { + if (isSpam(evidence.id)) { + acc.spam.push(evidence); + } else { + acc.real.push(evidence); + } + return acc; + }, + { spam: [], real: [] } + ); - const spamEvidences = data.evidences.filter((evidence) => isSpam(evidence.id)); - const realEvidences = data.evidences.filter((evidence) => !isSpam(evidence.id)); - return { realEvidences, spamEvidences }; + return { realEvidences: real, spamEvidences: spam }; }, [data, isSpam]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
web/src/pages/Cases/CaseDetails/Evidence/index.tsx (3)
11-12: LGTM: Imports are properly organized
The new imports for useSpamEvidence hook and Divider component are correctly placed and used within the component.
Also applies to: 18-18
110-115: LGTM: Efficient implementation of isSpam check
The isSpam callback is properly memoized and implements an efficient check using array includes.
11-11: Verify the implementation of useSpamEvidence hook
Let's ensure the hook is properly implemented and the GraphQL query is correctly structured.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the implementation of the useSpamEvidence hook and its usage.
The useSpamEvidence hook is properly implemented and integrated
The hook is well-structured with:
- Proper GraphQL query definition with
courtv2EvidenceSpamsByDeploymentfield - Correct type definitions for the response data
- Deployment-aware configuration
- Integration with React Query for data fetching
- Proper usage in the Evidence component for spam detection
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of useSpamEvidence hook
ast-grep --pattern 'export const useSpamEvidence = () => {
$$$
}'
# Check for the GraphQL query definition
rg -A 10 'courtv2EvidenceSpamsByDeployment'
Length of output: 2813
|
PR-Codex overview
This PR introduces a new
useSpamEvidencehook to fetch spam evidence data and integrates it into theEvidencecomponent. It enhances the functionality to filter and identify spam evidences based on the fetched data.Detailed summary
tsconfig.jsonto includedominlib.useSpamEvidencehook inweb/src/hooks/useSpamEvidence.ts.Evidencecomponent.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
useSpamEvidencefor fetching spam evidence data.Evidencecomponent to dynamically classify and display spam evidence.Bug Fixes
Chores