Logging to Logtail inside the Netlify update-settings function #1265
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kleros-v2 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
jaybuidl
force-pushed
the
feat(web)/notification-system-logtail
branch
from
b48bee3 to
a54c071
Compare
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit a54c071 and detected 113 issues on this pull request. Here's the issue category breakdown:
View more on Code Climate. |
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
jaybuidl
changed the title
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve enhancements to error handling and logging within the Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/src/utils/logger.ts (1)
24-24: Simplify object property shorthand fortargetsYou can simplify the code by using the object property shorthand syntax when the property name and the variable name are the same.
Apply this diff to simplify:
- pino.transport({ targets: targets }) + pino.transport({ targets })web/netlify/functions/update-settings.ts (1)
Line range hint
88-96: Correct the usage ofverifyTypedData; compare the recovered addressThe
verifyTypedDatafunction returns the recovered address, not a boolean. Currently, the code assigns the return value toisValidand checks if it's falsy, which will not work as intended. To properly verify the signature, compare the recovered address with the expected address.Apply this diff to fix the verification logic:
-const isValid = await verifyTypedData({ +const recoveredAddress = await verifyTypedData({ ...data, signature, }); -if (!isValid) { - // If the recovered address does not match the provided address, return an error +if (recoveredAddress.toLowerCase() !== lowerCaseAddress) { + // The recovered address does not match the provided address logAndThrowNewError("Signature verification failed"); - throw new Error("Signature verification failed"); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- web/netlify/functions/update-settings.ts (7 hunks)
- web/package.json (2 hunks)
- web/src/utils/logger.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/netlify/functions/update-settings.ts (1)
Line range hint
101-109: Verify consistency in table names between deletion and upsert operationsIn the deletion operation, the code references the
"users"table, whereas the upsert operation uses the"user-settings"table. Please confirm that this is intentional and that the correct tables are being accessed. Inconsistent table usage might lead to data integrity issues.Run the following script to verify the table usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Table Usage is Consistent and Intentional
After verifying the codebase, both the
"users"and"user-settings"tables are exclusively used withinweb/netlify/functions/update-settings.ts. The"users"table handles the deletion of user records, while the"user-settings"table manages the upsertion of user-specific settings. This separation ensures clear boundary management between general user data and user settings, maintaining data integrity.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of "users" and "user-settings" tables in the codebase. # Search for usages of the "users" table echo "Usages of 'from(\"users\")':" rg 'from\("users"\)' # Search for usages of the "user-settings" table echo "Usages of 'from(\"user-settings\")':" rg 'from\("user-settings"\)'Length of output: 418
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further verify the distinct roles of "users" and "user-settings" tables in the codebase. # Search for all usages of the "users" table and display surrounding context echo "Detailed usages of 'from(\"users\")':" rg -C 3 'from\("users"\)' # Search for all usages of the "user-settings" table and display surrounding context echo "Detailed usages of 'from(\"user-settings\")':" rg -C 3 'from\("user-settings"\)'Length of output: 1480
| @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ | |||
| "@filebase/client": "^0.0.5", | |||
| "@kleros/kleros-v2-contracts": "workspace:^", | |||
| "@kleros/ui-components-library": "^2.6.2", | |||
| "@logtail/pino": "^0.4.12", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Unused logging dependencies detected
It appears that "@logtail/pino" is added as a dependency but is not being utilized in the codebase. Additionally, "pino-pretty" is included but not referenced in any npm scripts or configuration files.
Please verify whether these dependencies are intended to be used and ensure they are properly integrated. If they are not required, consider removing them to maintain a clean and efficient dependency list.
🔗 Analysis chain
New logging dependencies added
The addition of "@logtail/pino", "pino", and "pino-pretty" dependencies indicates an enhancement in the project's logging capabilities. This aligns with the PR objectives of improving error handling and logging.
A few points to consider:
- Ensure that these new dependencies are compatible with the existing project setup.
- Verify that the chosen versions are stable and appropriate for the project's needs.
- Update any relevant documentation to reflect the new logging system.
- Consider adding a brief comment in the package.json file explaining the purpose of these new dependencies for future reference.
To ensure these new dependencies are being utilized in the project, let's run the following script:
Also applies to: 91-92
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new logging dependencies in the project
# Test: Search for import or require statements of the new logging libraries
echo "Searching for usage of new logging libraries:"
rg --type typescript --type javascript -e "from ['\"]@logtail/pino['\"]" -e "from ['\"]pino['\"]" -e "require\(['\"]@logtail/pino['\"]" -e "require\(['\"]pino['\"]"
# Test: Check if pino-pretty is used in any npm scripts
echo "Checking for pino-pretty usage in npm scripts:"
jq '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("pino-pretty"))' web/package.json
Length of output: 512
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new logging dependencies in the project
# Test: Search for import or require statements of the new logging libraries
echo "Searching for usage of new logging libraries in .ts and .js files:"
rg -g "*.ts" -g "*.js" -e "from ['\"]@logtail/pino['\"]" -e "from ['\"]pino['\"]" -e "require\(['\"]@logtail/pino['\"]\)" -e "require\(['\"]pino['\"]\)" .
# Test: Check if pino-pretty is used in any npm scripts
echo "Checking for pino-pretty usage in npm scripts:"
jq '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("pino-pretty"))' web/package.json
# Additional Test: Search for pino-pretty usage in configuration files
echo "Searching for pino-pretty usage in configuration files:"
rg -g "*.config.*" "pino-pretty"
Length of output: 886
| target: "pino-pretty", | ||
| options: {}, | ||
| level: "info", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider removing pino-pretty from production logging
pino-pretty is intended for development and debugging purposes and is not recommended for use in production environments due to performance overhead and potential security concerns. Including it in your production logger could impact performance.
| export const throwNewError = (logger: pino.Logger, message: string, error?: any) => { | ||
| if (!error) { | ||
| logger.error(message); | ||
| throw new Error(message); | ||
| } | ||
| if (typeof error === "string") { | ||
| logger.error(error, message); | ||
| throw new Error(message + ": " + error); | ||
| } else if (error instanceof Error) { | ||
| logger.error(error, message); | ||
| throw new Error(message + ": " + error.name + ": " + error.message); | ||
| } | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in throwNewError function
Consider refactoring the function to handle all error types consistently and to preserve stack traces by re-throwing the original error when possible. This ensures that the original error information is not lost, making debugging easier.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
-export const throwNewError = (logger: pino.Logger, message: string, error?: any) => {
- if (!error) {
- logger.error(message);
- throw new Error(message);
- }
- if (typeof error === "string") {
- logger.error(error, message);
- throw new Error(message + ": " + error);
- } else if (error instanceof Error) {
- logger.error(error, message);
- throw new Error(message + ": " + error.name + ": " + error.message);
- }
-};
+export const throwNewError = (logger: pino.Logger, message: string, error?: unknown): never => {
+ logger.error({ error }, message);
+ if (error instanceof Error) {
+ throw error;
+ } else if (typeof error === "string") {
+ throw new Error(`${message}: ${error}`);
+ } else {
+ throw new Error(message);
+ }
+};📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const throwNewError = (logger: pino.Logger, message: string, error?: any) => { | |
| if (!error) { | |
| logger.error(message); | |
| throw new Error(message); | |
| } | |
| if (typeof error === "string") { | |
| logger.error(error, message); | |
| throw new Error(message + ": " + error); | |
| } else if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| logger.error(error, message); | |
| throw new Error(message + ": " + error.name + ": " + error.message); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| export const throwNewError = (logger: pino.Logger, message: string, error?: unknown): never => { | |
| logger.error({ error }, message); | |
| if (error instanceof Error) { | |
| throw error; | |
| } else if (typeof error === "string") { | |
| throw new Error(`${message}: ${error}`); | |
| } else { | |
| throw new Error(message); | |
| } | |
| }; |
| logAndThrowNewError("Signature verification failed"); | ||
| throw new Error("Signature verification failed"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant throw after logAndThrowNewError
The logAndThrowNewError function already throws an error after logging. The subsequent throw new Error("Signature verification failed"); will not be reached and is redundant.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant throw statement:
logAndThrowNewError("Signature verification failed");
- throw new Error("Signature verification failed");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logAndThrowNewError("Signature verification failed"); | |
| throw new Error("Signature verification failed"); | |
| logAndThrowNewError("Signature verification failed"); |
| return { statusCode: 500, body: JSON.stringify({ message: `Error: ${err}` }) }; | ||
| } finally { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid returning internal error details in HTTP responses
Returning internal error objects directly to the client can expose sensitive information or implementation details. It's safer to provide a generic error message to the client while logging the detailed error internally.
Apply this diff to return a generic error message:
logger.error(err);
-return { statusCode: 500, body: JSON.stringify({ message: `Error: ${err}` }) };
+return { statusCode: 500, body: JSON.stringify({ message: "An unexpected error occurred." }) };Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| const logger = createLogger(process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN).child({ function: "update-settings" }); | ||
| const logAndThrowNewError = (message: string, error?: any) => throwNewError(logger, message, error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure LOGTAIL_TOKEN is defined and handle missing token cases
The LOGTAIL_TOKEN environment variable is used to initialize the logger without a check for its existence. If LOGTAIL_TOKEN is undefined, createLogger may fail or behave unexpectedly. To prevent potential runtime errors, consider adding a check to handle missing or invalid LOGTAIL_TOKEN values.
Apply this diff to add the check:
+if (!process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN) {
+ throw new Error("LOGTAIL_TOKEN environment variable is not set.");
+}
const logger = createLogger(process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN).child({ function: "update-settings" });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const logger = createLogger(process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN).child({ function: "update-settings" }); | |
| const logAndThrowNewError = (message: string, error?: any) => throwNewError(logger, message, error); | |
| if (!process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN) { | |
| throw new Error("LOGTAIL_TOKEN environment variable is not set."); | |
| } | |
| const logger = createLogger(process.env.LOGTAIL_TOKEN).child({ function: "update-settings" }); | |
| const logAndThrowNewError = (message: string, error?: any) => throwNewError(logger, message, error); |
PR-Codex overview
This PR focuses on making changes related to the settings and notifications functionality. It includes the deletion of some files, updates to configuration files, addition of new types/interfaces, addition of new regular expressions, creation of new scripts, and updates to various components and utils.
Detailed summary
index.tsx,FormNotifs/index.tsx,FormEmail.tsx, andvscode/settings.jsonfiles.prettier.configPathand addedsonarlint.connectedMode.projectinvscode/settings.json.ISettings,IHelp, andIDappListinnavbar/index.tsx.Help.tsxto importIHelpfrom...contactDetailsineip712-messages.ts.index.tsto add new regex constants.generateSupabaseTypes.sh.Menu/index.tsxto importIHelpandISettingsfrom...navbar/Menu/Settings/index.tsxto importISettingsfrom../../index.navbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/index.tsxto importISettingsfrom../../../indexand added new componentFormContactDetails.package.jsonto add new scriptgenerate:supabase.FormContactinnavbar/Menu/Settings/Notifications/FormContactDetails/FormContact.tsx.package.json.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores