Additional annotations

[Miles-Garnsey]

What this PR does:

Exposes cass-operator's new AdditionalAnnotations field in the CRD.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1094

Checklist

• Changes manually tested
• Automated Tests added/updated
• Documentation added/updated
• CHANGELOG.md updated (not required for documentation PRs)
• CLA Signed: DataStax CLA

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (f25850d) 57.06% compared to head (b4850e7) 56.87%.

❗ Current head b4850e7 differs from pull request most recent head c03fed1. Consider uploading reports for the commit c03fed1 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1169      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.06%   56.87%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines       10433    10432       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5954     5933      -21     
- Misses       3959     3974      +15     
- Partials      520      525       +5     

Files	Coverage Δ
apis/k8ssandra/v1alpha1/k8ssandracluster_types.go	44.30% <ø> (ø)
pkg/cassandra/datacenter.go	66.31% <25.00%> (-0.45%)	⬇️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

[Miles-Garnsey]

This should be good to go... There is one failing test but I don't think it is related - probably a flake but I'm re-running.

[Miles-Garnsey]

Alex says:

1. We need to add something like this so that we deploy the right cass-operator with the new fields.
2. He wants an e2e test for the new field as well.

[Miles-Garnsey]

Looks like we can't progress this as we don't have a cass-operator image right now due to CI failures. I don't know how to fix those so will put this on hold pending a new image being built.

[adejanovski]

Works great!

Approved, pending passing unit tests (I think it's just a flake and just re-ran them).

[Miles-Garnsey]

Manually tested one more time, but this looks good to go indeed.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

5.9% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud