You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When creating a MedusaRestoreJob, the restore mapping is computed by the operator and stored in the object status. It is then use by each node to figure out which backup node it should restore from.
In case of an in place restore (we're restoring a backup that was taken on the same cluster), each node should map to itself.
It doesn't seem to be the case and I can see nodes being shuffled in the restore mapping:
Also the in place nature of the backup isn't correctly identified.
In order to ensure restore safety, we need to make sure in place restored are correctly detected and restore mappings are consistent.
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
When creating a MedusaRestoreJob, the restore mapping is computed by the operator and stored in the object status. It is then use by each node to figure out which backup node it should restore from.
In case of an in place restore (we're restoring a backup that was taken on the same cluster), each node should map to itself.
It doesn't seem to be the case and I can see nodes being shuffled in the restore mapping:
Also the in place nature of the backup isn't correctly identified.
In order to ensure restore safety, we need to make sure in place restored are correctly detected and restore mappings are consistent.
Definition of Done
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: