Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add AdditionalAnnotations field #600

Closed
Miles-Garnsey opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #601
Closed

Add AdditionalAnnotations field #600

Miles-Garnsey opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #601
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Miles-Garnsey
Copy link
Member

What is missing?

We currently have an AdditionalLabels field in the CassDC CRD which propagates labels to the resources created by cass-operator. Per this ticket, there is a need in the community to be able to propagate annotations in addition to labels.

Why is this needed?

As above.

@Miles-Garnsey Miles-Garnsey added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 19, 2023
@Miles-Garnsey Miles-Garnsey moved this to Ready For Review in K8ssandra Dec 19, 2023
@adejanovski adejanovski added the ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' label Dec 19, 2023
@adejanovski adejanovski moved this from Ready For Review to Review in K8ssandra Jan 9, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added review Issues in the state 'review' and removed ready-for-review Issues in the state 'ready-for-review' labels Jan 9, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review to Done in K8ssandra Jan 9, 2024
@adejanovski adejanovski added done Issues in the state 'done' and removed review Issues in the state 'review' labels Jan 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
done Issues in the state 'done' enhancement New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants