Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Support both 2.9 and 3.x at the same time #1013

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

cderici
Copy link
Contributor

@cderici cderici commented Jan 24, 2024

Description

Uses both schemas to generate clients that have code to support both 2.9 and 3.x facade functionality at the same time (no need to keep separate sets of client files and dynamically check -- like we did in 3.0.4 to do this).

Adds a separate integration tests against 2.9, let's see which functionalities are gonna blow up, then we'll continue from there.

@cderici cderici force-pushed the one-track-to-rule-them-all branch from 4b06e6b to 9c22396 Compare January 24, 2024 17:35
@cderici cderici force-pushed the one-track-to-rule-them-all branch from 12c098b to 3938d1e Compare January 26, 2024 19:02
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2024

This PR is marked as incomplete because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Please remove incomplete label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the state/incomplete need more information label Mar 6, 2024
@cderici cderici added work-in-progress and removed state/incomplete need more information labels Mar 6, 2024
@jneo8
Copy link

jneo8 commented Jun 12, 2024

Hi @cderici

I would like to know the status of this PR, is this one still on the schedule?

@cderici
Copy link
Contributor Author

cderici commented Jun 12, 2024

I would like to know the status of this PR, is this one still on the schedule?

Hey @jneo8, not really tbh, we have way more things having higher priority right now in Juju.

If you're having trouble migrating from 2.9 to 3.x feel free to reach out at Juju channel on Matrix.

@jneo8
Copy link

jneo8 commented Jun 13, 2024

We just want to know if python-libjuju can support this in a short time(6 months) to make the technical decision.

Thanks for reply.

@Aflynn50
Copy link
Contributor

Aflynn50 commented Aug 1, 2024

We just want to know if python-libjuju can support this in a short time(6 months) to make the technical decision.

Thanks for reply.

Hey @jneo8,
There are no plans right now to continue this work.

@Aflynn50 Aflynn50 closed this Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants