You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a superagent release some time since 1.8.0, the superagent team has begun using request._end internally. Because this is something superagent-cache has done for a long time, there is now a naming collision for users of more recent versions of superagent.
Because ._end is listed as an API method in superagent-cache's docs, the only way to avoid the name collision is to release a breaking change (2.x) of superagent-cache that changes my ._end function's name.
Because there are a number of things I'd like to include in superagent-cache's 2.x release (including compatibility with the latest superagent releases as well as everything listed in #25), fixing this issue is not trivial. My goal of keeping superagent-cache and all of its related cache modules as well as superagent-cache-plugin in major release sync only increases the maintenance burden.
If this bug is causing you problems, please comment on this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In a
superagent
release some time since1.8.0
, the superagent team has begun usingrequest._end
internally. Because this is somethingsuperagent-cache
has done for a long time, there is now a naming collision for users of more recent versions ofsuperagent
.Because
._end
is listed as an API method insuperagent-cache
's docs, the only way to avoid the name collision is to release a breaking change (2.x
) ofsuperagent-cache
that changes my._end
function's name.Because there are a number of things I'd like to include in
superagent-cache
's2.x
release (including compatibility with the latestsuperagent
releases as well as everything listed in #25), fixing this issue is not trivial. My goal of keepingsuperagent-cache
and all of its related cache modules as well assuperagent-cache-plugin
in major release sync only increases the maintenance burden.If this bug is causing you problems, please comment on this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: