Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed the scanType parameter #210

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024
Merged

Removed the scanType parameter #210

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

vishalhcl-5960
Copy link
Collaborator

Removed the scanType parameter.
From the backend perspective, only stopping the addition of scanType parameter in the properties map. If we removed the scanType parameter from the DynamicAnalyzer constructor too then it will show a warning message(WARNING: Unknown parameter(s) found for class type 'com.hcl.appscan.jenkins.plugin.scanners.DynamicAnalyzer': scanType) for the older pipelines which is not a expected behavior at all.

@kripajoym
Copy link
Collaborator

If the user pipeline includes the scanType, should we add a warning to inform the customer that the scan type has been removed from the DAST parameter?

@vishalhcl-5960
Copy link
Collaborator Author

If the user pipeline includes the scanType, should we add a warning to inform the customer that the scan type has been removed from the DAST parameter?

As per the internal discussion, We will show this change in change-log file instead of showing a warning in the console output.

@vishalhcl-5960 vishalhcl-5960 merged commit 7f97ca1 into jenkinsci:ASA-7829 Apr 29, 2024
1 check passed
vishalhcl-5960 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
* ScanType Parameter removal
vishalhcl-5960 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
* Removed the scanType parameter (#210)

* ScanType Parameter removal
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants