Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add required SECURITY.md file for OSSF Scorecard compliance #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rdower
Copy link
Contributor

@rdower rdower commented May 3, 2024

add required SECURITY.md file for OSSF Scorecard compliance

kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
Drop support for virtualizing adaptive PEBS, as KVM's implementation is
architecturally broken without an obvious/easy path forward, and because
exposing adaptive PEBS can leak host LBRs to the guest, i.e. can leak
host kernel addresses to the guest.

Bug #1 is that KVM doesn't account for the upper 32 bits of
IA32_FIXED_CTR_CTRL when (re)programming fixed counters, e.g
fixed_ctrl_field() drops the upper bits, reprogram_fixed_counters()
stores local variables as u8s and truncates the upper bits too, etc.

Bug #2 is that, because KVM _always_ sets precise_ip to a non-zero value
for PEBS events, perf will _always_ generate an adaptive record, even if
the guest requested a basic record.  Note, KVM will also enable adaptive
PEBS in individual *counter*, even if adaptive PEBS isn't exposed to the
guest, but this is benign as MSR_PEBS_DATA_CFG is guaranteed to be zero,
i.e. the guest will only ever see Basic records.

Bug #3 is in perf.  intel_pmu_disable_fixed() doesn't clear the upper
bits either, i.e. leaves ICL_FIXED_0_ADAPTIVE set, and
intel_pmu_enable_fixed() effectively doesn't clear ICL_FIXED_0_ADAPTIVE
either.  I.e. perf _always_ enables ADAPTIVE counters, regardless of what
KVM requests.

Bug #4 is that adaptive PEBS *might* effectively bypass event filters set
by the host, as "Updated Memory Access Info Group" records information
that might be disallowed by userspace via KVM_SET_PMU_EVENT_FILTER.

Bug #5 is that KVM doesn't ensure LBR MSRs hold guest values (or at least
zeros) when entering a vCPU with adaptive PEBS, which allows the guest
to read host LBRs, i.e. host RIPs/addresses, by enabling "LBR Entries"
records.

Disable adaptive PEBS support as an immediate fix due to the severity of
the LBR leak in particular, and because fixing all of the bugs will be
non-trivial, e.g. not suitable for backporting to stable kernels.

Note!  This will break live migration, but trying to make KVM play nice
with live migration would be quite complicated, wouldn't be guaranteed to
work (i.e. KVM might still kill/confuse the guest), and it's not clear
that there are any publicly available VMMs that support adaptive PEBS,
let alone live migrate VMs that support adaptive PEBS, e.g. QEMU doesn't
support PEBS in any capacity.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
Fixes: c59a1f1 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Add IA32_PEBS_ENABLE MSR emulation for extended PEBS")
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Like Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: Mingwei Zhang <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhang Xiong <[email protected]>
Cc: Lv Zhiyuan <[email protected]>
Cc: Dapeng Mi <[email protected]>
Cc: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Like Xu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2024
When I did hard offline test with hugetlb pages, below deadlock occurs:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.8.0-11409-gf6cef5f8c37f #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
bash/46904 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffffabe68910 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: static_key_slow_dec+0x16/0x60

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffffabf92ea8 (pcp_batch_high_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: zone_pcp_disable+0x16/0x40

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (pcp_batch_high_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x6c/0x770
       page_alloc_cpu_online+0x3c/0x70
       cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x397/0x5f0
       __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x71/0xe0
       _cpu_up+0xeb/0x210
       cpu_up+0x91/0xe0
       cpuhp_bringup_mask+0x49/0xb0
       bringup_nonboot_cpus+0xb7/0xe0
       smp_init+0x25/0xa0
       kernel_init_freeable+0x15f/0x3e0
       kernel_init+0x15/0x1b0
       ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

-> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x1cd0
       lock_acquire+0xc0/0x2b0
       cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xc0
       static_key_slow_dec+0x16/0x60
       __hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio+0x1b9/0x200
       dissolve_free_huge_page+0x211/0x260
       __page_handle_poison+0x45/0xc0
       memory_failure+0x65e/0xc70
       hard_offline_page_store+0x55/0xa0
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0
       vfs_write+0x387/0x550
       ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
       do_syscall_64+0xca/0x1e0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(pcp_batch_high_lock);
                               lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
                               lock(pcp_batch_high_lock);
  rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

5 locks held by bash/46904:
 #0: ffff98f6c3bb23f0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
 #1: ffff98f6c328e488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0xf8/0x1d0
 #2: ffff98ef83b31890 (kn->active#113){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x100/0x1d0
 #3: ffffffffabf9db48 (mf_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memory_failure+0x44/0xc70
 #4: ffffffffabf92ea8 (pcp_batch_high_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: zone_pcp_disable+0x16/0x40

stack backtrace:
CPU: 10 PID: 46904 Comm: bash Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.8.0-11409-gf6cef5f8c37f #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
 check_noncircular+0x129/0x140
 __lock_acquire+0x1298/0x1cd0
 lock_acquire+0xc0/0x2b0
 cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xc0
 static_key_slow_dec+0x16/0x60
 __hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio+0x1b9/0x200
 dissolve_free_huge_page+0x211/0x260
 __page_handle_poison+0x45/0xc0
 memory_failure+0x65e/0xc70
 hard_offline_page_store+0x55/0xa0
 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12c/0x1d0
 vfs_write+0x387/0x550
 ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
 do_syscall_64+0xca/0x1e0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7fc862314887
Code: 10 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
RSP: 002b:00007fff19311268 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000c RCX: 00007fc862314887
RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: 000056405645fe10 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000056405645fe10 R08: 00007fc8623d1460 R09: 000000007fffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000c
R13: 00007fc86241b780 R14: 00007fc862417600 R15: 00007fc862416a00

In short, below scene breaks the lock dependency chain:

 memory_failure
  __page_handle_poison
   zone_pcp_disable -- lock(pcp_batch_high_lock)
   dissolve_free_huge_page
    __hugetlb_vmemmap_restore_folio
     static_key_slow_dec
      cpus_read_lock -- rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock)

Fix this by calling drain_all_pages() instead.

This issue won't occur until commit a6b4085 ("mm: hugetlb: replace
hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled with a static_key").  As it introduced
rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock) in dissolve_free_huge_page() code path while
lock(pcp_batch_high_lock) is already in the __page_handle_poison().

[[email protected]: extend comment per Oscar]
[[email protected]: reflow block comment]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: a6b4085 ("mm: hugetlb: replace hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled with a static_key")
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <[email protected]>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 syzbot reports that nf_reinject() could be called without
         rcu_read_lock() when flushing pending packets at nfnetlink
         queue removal, from Eric Dumazet.

Patch #2 flushes ipset list:set when canceling garbage collection to
         reference to other lists to fix a race, from Jozsef Kadlecsik.

Patch #3 restores q-in-q matching with nft_payload by reverting
         f6ae9f1 ("netfilter: nft_payload: add C-VLAN support").

Patch #4 fixes vlan mangling in skbuff when vlan offload is present
         in skbuff, without this patch nft_payload corrupts packets
         in this case.

Patch #5 fixes possible nul-deref in tproxy no IP address is found in
         netdevice, reported by syzbot and patch from Florian Westphal.

Patch #6 removes a superfluous restriction which prevents loose fib
         lookups from input and forward hooks, from Eric Garver.

My assessment is that patches #1, #2 and #5 address possible kernel
crash, anything else in this batch fixes broken features.

netfilter pull request 24-05-29

* tag 'nf-24-05-29' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  netfilter: nft_fib: allow from forward/input without iif selector
  netfilter: tproxy: bail out if IP has been disabled on the device
  netfilter: nft_payload: skbuff vlan metadata mangle support
  netfilter: nft_payload: restore vlan q-in-q match support
  netfilter: ipset: Add list flush to cancel_gc
  netfilter: nfnetlink_queue: acquire rcu_read_lock() in instance_destroy_rcu()
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
With commit c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF")
we are hitting below issue. This happens because in IOPF enablement path
it holds spin lock with irq disable and then tries to take mutex lock.

dmesg:
-----
[    0.938739] =============================
[    0.938740] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    0.938742] 6.10.0-rc1+ #1 Not tainted
[    0.938745] -----------------------------
[    0.938746] swapper/0/1 is trying to lock:
[    0.938748] ffffffff8c9f01d8 (&port_lock_key){....}-{3:3}, at: serial8250_console_write+0x78/0x4a0
[    0.938767] other info that might help us debug this:
[    0.938768] context-{5:5}
[    0.938769] 7 locks held by swapper/0/1:
[    0.938772]  #0: ffff888101a91310 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bus_iommu_probe+0x70/0x160
[    0.938790]  #1: ffff888101d1f1b8 (&domain->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xa5/0x700
[    0.938799]  #2: ffff888101cc3d18 (&dev_data->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: amd_iommu_attach_device+0xc5/0x700
[    0.938806]  #3: ffff888100052830 (&iommu->lock){....}-{2:2}, at: amd_iommu_iopf_add_device+0x3f/0xa0
[    0.938813]  #4: ffffffff8945a340 (console_lock){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: _printk+0x48/0x50
[    0.938822]  #5: ffffffff8945a390 (console_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x58/0x4e0
[    0.938867]  #6: ffffffff82459f80 (console_owner){....}-{0:0}, at: console_flush_all+0x1f0/0x4e0
[    0.938872] stack backtrace:
[    0.938874] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1+ #1
[    0.938877] Hardware name: HP HP EliteBook 745 G3/807E, BIOS N73 Ver. 01.39 04/16/2019

Fix above issue by re-arranging code in attach device path:
  - move device PASID/IOPF enablement outside lock in AMD IOMMU driver.
    This is safe as core layer holds group->mutex lock before calling
    iommu_ops->attach_dev.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Chris Bainbridge <[email protected]>
Fixes: c4cb231 ("iommu/amd: Add support for enable/disable IOPF")
Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Chris Bainbridge <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mikhail Gavrilov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
…PLES event"

This reverts commit 7d1405c.

This causes segfaults in some cases, as reported by Milian:

  ```
  sudo /usr/bin/perf record -z --call-graph dwarf -e cycles -e
  raw_syscalls:sys_enter ls
  ...
  [ perf record: Woken up 3 times to write data ]
  malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)
  Aborted
  ```

  Backtrace with GDB + debuginfod:

  ```
  malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)

  Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
  __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6,
  no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
  Downloading source file /usr/src/debug/glibc/glibc/nptl/pthread_kill.c
  44            return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO
  (ret) : 0;
  (gdb) bt
  #0  __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>,
  signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
  #1  0x00007ffff6ea8eb3 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>,
  signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78
  #2  0x00007ffff6e50a30 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/
  raise.c:26
  #3  0x00007ffff6e384c3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
  #4  0x00007ffff6e39354 in __libc_message_impl (fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ffff6fc22ea
  "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:132
  #5  0x00007ffff6eb3085 in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ffff6fc5850
  "malloc(): invalid next size (unsorted)") at malloc.c:5772
  #6  0x00007ffff6eb657c in _int_malloc (av=av@entry=0x7ffff6ff6ac0
  <main_arena>, bytes=bytes@entry=368) at malloc.c:4081
  #7  0x00007ffff6eb877e in __libc_calloc (n=<optimized out>,
  elem_size=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3754
  #8  0x000055555569bdb6 in perf_session.do_write_header ()
  #9  0x00005555555a373a in __cmd_record.constprop.0 ()
  #10 0x00005555555a6846 in cmd_record ()
  #11 0x000055555564db7f in run_builtin ()
  #12 0x000055555558ed77 in main ()
  ```

  Valgrind memcheck:
  ```
  ==45136== Invalid write of size 8
  ==45136==    at 0x2B38A5: perf_event__synthesize_id_sample (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x157069: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==  Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd
  ==45136==    at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675)
  ==45136==    by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==
  ==45136== Syscall param write(buf) points to unaddressable byte(s)
  ==45136==    at 0x575953D: __libc_write (write.c:26)
  ==45136==    by 0x575953D: write (write.c:24)
  ==45136==    by 0x35761F: ion (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x357778: writen (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1548F7: record__write (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15708A: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==  Address 0x6a866a8 is 0 bytes after a block of size 40 alloc'd
  ==45136==    at 0x4849BF3: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1675)
  ==45136==    by 0x3574AB: zalloc (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x1570E0: __cmd_record.constprop.0 (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x15A845: cmd_record (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x201B7E: run_builtin (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==    by 0x142D76: main (in /usr/bin/perf)
  ==45136==
 -----

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/23879991.0LEYPuXRzz@milian-workstation/
Reported-by: Milian Wolff <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Milian Wolff <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] # 6.8+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zl9ksOlHJHnKM70p@x1
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2024
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in
btrfs_set_item_key_safe():

  BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!
  invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]

With the following stack trace:

  #0  btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)
  #1  btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)
  #2  log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)
  #3  btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)
  #4  btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)
  #5  btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)
  #6  btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)
  #7  btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)
  #8  vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)
  #9  vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)
  #10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)
  #11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)
  #12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
  #14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)
  #15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)
  #16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)

So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an
extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,
triggering the BUG().

This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with
drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)
to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:

  >>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"])
  leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610
  leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
          item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
                  otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)
          item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192
          item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096
  ...

So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5
(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and
item 5 starts at i_size.

Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash:

  >>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root
  >>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0))
  >>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0])
  leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5
  leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000
  fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
  chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
  	...
          item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160
                  generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288
                  block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
                  sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
                  atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
                  otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
          item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13
                  index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
          item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37
                  location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
                  transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
                  name: user.a
                  data a
          item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 1 (regular)
                  extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288
                  extent compression 0 (none)
          item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53
                  generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
                  prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
                  prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096

Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree,
but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in
the leaf.

btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents
beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents
that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies
the prealloc extent items to the log tree.

If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which
unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem
tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In
particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent
item that was already copied to the log tree.

This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario,
including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync,
overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash
is triggered by the following sequence of events:

- Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a
  prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is
  the last item in its B-tree leaf.
- The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items
  to the log tree.
- An xattr is set on the file, which sets the
  BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag.
- The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is
  extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight.
- The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this
  calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls
  btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the
  filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it
  is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf().
- btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path.
- The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of
  the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part
  from 8k-12k.
- btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent
  8k-12k.
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into
  the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent
  that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync.
- fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k
  extent that was written.
- This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires
  adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to
  8k.
- btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent
  starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG().

Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file
extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap.

CC: [email protected] # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 1, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), but actually triggering such deadlocks is
beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved.
E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant
TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very
uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to
generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
The frame pointer unwinder relies on a standard layout of the stack
frame, consisting of (in downward order)

   Calling frame:
     PC   <---------+
     LR             |
     SP             |
     FP             |
     .. locals ..   |
   Callee frame:    |
     PC             |
     LR             |
     SP             |
     FP   ----------+

where after storing its previous value on the stack, FP is made to point
at the location of PC in the callee stack frame, using the canonical
prologue:

   mov     ip, sp
   stmdb   sp!, {fp, ip, lr, pc}
   sub     fp, ip, #4

The ftrace code assumes that this activation record is pushed first, and
that any stack space for locals is allocated below this. Strict
adherence to this would imply that the caller's value of SP at the time
of the function call can always be obtained by adding 4 to FP (which
points to PC in the callee frame).

However, recent versions of GCC appear to deviate from this rule, and so
the only reliable way to obtain the caller's value of SP is to read it
from the activation record. Since this involves a read from memory
rather than simple arithmetic, we need to use the uaccess API here which
protects against inadvertent data aborts resulting from attempts to
dereference bogus FP values.

The plain uaccess API is ftrace instrumented itself, so to avoid
unbounded recursion, use the __get_kernel_nofault() primitive directly.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/alp44tukzo6mvcwl4ke4ehhmojrqnv6xfcdeuliybxfjfvgd3e@gpjvwj33cc76

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Thorsten Scherer <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Shin'ichiro reported that when he's running fstests' test-case
btrfs/167 on emulated zoned devices, he's seeing the following NULL
pointer dereference in 'btrfs_zone_finish_endio()':

  Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000011: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000088-0x000000000000008f]
  CPU: 4 PID: 2332440 Comm: kworker/u80:15 Tainted: G        W          6.10.0-rc2-kts+ #4
  Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X11SPi-TF, BIOS 3.3 02/21/2020
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]

  RSP: 0018:ffff88867f107a90 EFLAGS: 00010206
  RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff893e5534
  RDX: 0000000000000011 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000088
  RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed1081696028
  R10: ffff88840b4b0143 R11: ffff88834dfff600 R12: ffff88840b4b0000
  R13: 0000000000020000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff888530ad5210
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888e3f800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f87223fff38 CR3: 00000007a7c6a002 CR4: 00000000007706f0
  DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  PKRU: 55555554
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
   ? die_addr+0x46/0x70
   ? exc_general_protection+0x14f/0x250
   ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
   ? do_raw_read_unlock+0x44/0x70
   ? btrfs_zone_finish_endio.part.0+0x34/0x160 [btrfs]
   btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x5d9/0x19a0 [btrfs]
   ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
   ? do_raw_write_lock+0x90/0x260
   ? __pfx_do_raw_write_lock+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
   ? _raw_write_unlock+0x23/0x40
   ? btrfs_finish_ordered_zoned+0x5a9/0x850 [btrfs]
   ? lock_acquire+0x435/0x500
   btrfs_work_helper+0x1b1/0xa70 [btrfs]
   ? __schedule+0x10a8/0x60b0
   ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
   process_one_work+0x862/0x1410
   ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
   ? assign_work+0x16c/0x240
   worker_thread+0x5e6/0x1010
   ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
   kthread+0x2c3/0x3a0
   ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xce/0x110
   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
   </TASK>

Enabling CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT revealed the following assertion to
trigger:

  assertion failed: !list_empty(&ordered->list), in fs/btrfs/zoned.c:1815

This indicates, that we're missing the checksums list on the
ordered_extent. As btrfs/167 is doing a NOCOW write this is to be
expected.

Further analysis with drgn confirmed the assumption:

  >>> inode = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[11]['ordered'].inode
  >>> btrfs_inode = drgn.container_of(inode, "struct btrfs_inode", \
         				"vfs_inode")
  >>> print(btrfs_inode.flags)
  (u32)1

As zoned emulation mode simulates conventional zones on regular devices,
we cannot use zone-append for writing. But we're only attaching dummy
checksums if we're doing a zone-append write.

So for NOCOW zoned data writes on conventional zones, also attach a
dummy checksum.

Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Fixes: cbfce4c ("btrfs: optimize the logical to physical mapping for zoned writes")
CC: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]> # 6.6+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
The syzbot fuzzer found that the interrupt-URB completion callback in
the cdc-wdm driver was taking too long, and the driver's immediate
resubmission of interrupt URBs with -EPROTO status combined with the
dummy-hcd emulation to cause a CPU lockup:

cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: nonzero urb status received: -71
cdc_wdm 1-1:1.0: wdm_int_callback - 0 bytes
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [syz-executor782:6625]
CPU#0 Utilization every 4s during lockup:
	#1:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#2:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#3:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#4:  98% system,	  0% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
	#5:  98% system,	  1% softirq,	  3% hardirq,	  0% idle
Modules linked in:
irq event stamp: 73096
hardirqs last  enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_emit_next_record kernel/printk/printk.c:2935 [inline]
hardirqs last  enabled at (73095): [<ffff80008037bc00>] console_flush_all+0x650/0xb74 kernel/printk/printk.c:2994
hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] __el1_irq arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:533 [inline]
hardirqs last disabled at (73096): [<ffff80008af10b00>] el1_interrupt+0x24/0x68 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:551
softirqs last  enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] softirq_handle_end kernel/softirq.c:400 [inline]
softirqs last  enabled at (73048): [<ffff8000801ea530>] handle_softirqs+0xa60/0xc34 kernel/softirq.c:582
softirqs last disabled at (73043): [<ffff800080020de8>] __do_softirq+0x14/0x20 kernel/softirq.c:588
CPU: 0 PID: 6625 Comm: syz-executor782 Tainted: G        W          6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-g8867bbd4a056 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024

Testing showed that the problem did not occur if the two error
messages -- the first two lines above -- were removed; apparently adding
material to the kernel log takes a surprisingly large amount of time.

In any case, the best approach for preventing these lockups and to
avoid spamming the log with thousands of error messages per second is
to ratelimit the two dev_err() calls.  Therefore we replace them with
dev_err_ratelimited().

Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Greg KH <[email protected]>
Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/
Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/
Fixes: 9908a32 ("USB: remove err() macro from usb class drivers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/[email protected]/
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Luis has been reporting an assert failure when freeing an inode
cluster during inode inactivation for a while. The assert looks
like:

 XFS: Assertion failed: bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE, file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 241
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
 kernel BUG at fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102!
 Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
 CPU: 4 PID: 73 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc1 #4
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
 Workqueue: xfs-inodegc/loop5 xfs_inodegc_worker [xfs]
 RIP: 0010:assfail (fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:102) xfs
 RSP: 0018:ffff88810188f7f0 EFLAGS: 00010202
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88816e748250 RCX: 1ffffffff844b0e7
 RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: ffff88810188f558 RDI: ffffffffc2431fa0
 RBP: 1ffff11020311f01 R08: 0000000042431f9f R09: ffffed1020311e9b
 R10: ffff88810188f4df R11: ffffffffac725d70 R12: ffff88817a3f4000
 R13: ffff88812182f000 R14: ffff88810188f998 R15: ffffffffc2423f80
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881c8400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 000055fe9d0f109c CR3: 000000014426c002 CR4: 0000000000770ef0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 PKRU: 55555554
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
 xfs_trans_read_buf_map (fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c:241 (discriminator 1)) xfs
 xfs_imap_to_bp (fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h:210 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c:138) xfs
 xfs_inode_item_precommit (fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c:145) xfs
 xfs_trans_run_precommits (fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c:931) xfs
 __xfs_trans_commit (fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c:966) xfs
 xfs_inactive_ifree (fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:1811) xfs
 xfs_inactive (fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c:2013) xfs
 xfs_inodegc_worker (fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1841 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c:1886) xfs
 process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3231)
 worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3306 (discriminator 2) kernel/workqueue.c:3393 (discriminator 2))
 kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389)
 ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147)
 ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257)
  </TASK>

And occurs when the the inode precommit handlers is attempt to look
up the inode cluster buffer to attach the inode for writeback.

The trail of logic that I can reconstruct is as follows.

	1. the inode is clean when inodegc runs, so it is not
	   attached to a cluster buffer when precommit runs.

	2. #1 implies the inode cluster buffer may be clean and not
	   pinned by dirty inodes when inodegc runs.

	3. #2 implies that the inode cluster buffer can be reclaimed
	   by memory pressure at any time.

	4. The assert failure implies that the cluster buffer was
	   attached to the transaction, but not marked done. It had
	   been accessed earlier in the transaction, but not marked
	   done.

	5. #4 implies the cluster buffer has been invalidated (i.e.
	   marked stale).

	6. #5 implies that the inode cluster buffer was instantiated
	   uninitialised in the transaction in xfs_ifree_cluster(),
	   which only instantiates the buffers to invalidate them
	   and never marks them as done.

Given factors 1-3, this issue is highly dependent on timing and
environmental factors. Hence the issue can be very difficult to
reproduce in some situations, but highly reliable in others. Luis
has an environment where it can be reproduced easily by g/531 but,
OTOH, I've reproduced it only once in ~2000 cycles of g/531.

I think the fix is to have xfs_ifree_cluster() set the XBF_DONE flag
on the cluster buffers, even though they may not be initialised. The
reasons why I think this is safe are:

	1. A buffer cache lookup hit on a XBF_STALE buffer will
	   clear the XBF_DONE flag. Hence all future users of the
	   buffer know they have to re-initialise the contents
	   before use and mark it done themselves.

	2. xfs_trans_binval() sets the XFS_BLI_STALE flag, which
	   means the buffer remains locked until the journal commit
	   completes and the buffer is unpinned. Hence once marked
	   XBF_STALE/XFS_BLI_STALE by xfs_ifree_cluster(), the only
	   context that can access the freed buffer is the currently
	   running transaction.

	3. #2 implies that future buffer lookups in the currently
	   running transaction will hit the transaction match code
	   and not the buffer cache. Hence XBF_STALE and
	   XFS_BLI_STALE will not be cleared unless the transaction
	   initialises and logs the buffer with valid contents
	   again. At which point, the buffer will be marked marked
	   XBF_DONE again, so having XBF_DONE already set on the
	   stale buffer is a moot point.

	4. #2 also implies that any concurrent access to that
	   cluster buffer will block waiting on the buffer lock
	   until the inode cluster has been fully freed and is no
	   longer an active inode cluster buffer.

	5. #4 + #1 means that any future user of the disk range of
	   that buffer will always see the range of disk blocks
	   covered by the cluster buffer as not done, and hence must
	   initialise the contents themselves.

	6. Setting XBF_DONE in xfs_ifree_cluster() then means the
	   unlinked inode precommit code will see a XBF_DONE buffer
	   from the transaction match as it expects. It can then
	   attach the stale but newly dirtied inode to the stale
	   but newly dirtied cluster buffer without unexpected
	   failures. The stale buffer will then sail through the
	   journal and do the right thing with the attached stale
	   inode during unpin.

Hence the fix is just one line of extra code. The explanation of
why we have to set XBF_DONE in xfs_ifree_cluster, OTOH, is long and
complex....

Fixes: 82842fe ("xfs: fix AGF vs inode cluster buffer deadlock")
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
…git/netfilter/nf

Pablo Neira Ayuso says:

====================
Netfilter fixes for net

The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net:

Patch #1 fixes the suspicious RCU usage warning that resulted from the
	 recent fix for the race between namespace cleanup and gc in
	 ipset left out checking the pernet exit phase when calling
	 rcu_dereference_protected(), from Jozsef Kadlecsik.

Patch #2 fixes incorrect input and output netdevice in SRv6 prerouting
	 hooks, from Jianguo Wu.

Patch #3 moves nf_hooks_lwtunnel sysctl toggle to the netfilter core.
	 The connection tracking system is loaded on-demand, this
	 ensures availability of this knob regardless.

Patch #4-#5 adds selftests for SRv6 netfilter hooks also from Jianguo Wu.

netfilter pull request 24-06-19

* tag 'nf-24-06-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf:
  selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX6 behavior with netfilter
  selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX4 behavior with netfilter
  netfilter: move the sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel into the netfilter core
  seg6: fix parameter passing when calling NF_HOOK() in End.DX4 and End.DX6 behaviors
  netfilter: ipset: Fix suspicious rcu_dereference_protected()
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
…play

During inode logging (and log replay too), we are holding a transaction
handle and we often need to call btrfs_iget(), which will read an inode
from its subvolume btree if it's not loaded in memory and that results in
allocating an inode with GFP_KERNEL semantics at the btrfs_alloc_inode()
callback - and this may recurse into the filesystem in case we are under
memory pressure and attempt to commit the current transaction, resulting
in a deadlock since the logging (or log replay) task is holding a
transaction handle open.

Syzbot reported this with the following stack traces:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.1/9919 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
  ffffffff8dd3aac0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
         __mutex_lock+0x175/0x9c0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
         btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x8cb/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7079
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
         vfs_write+0x6b6/0x1140 fs/read_write.c:590
         ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:643
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #2 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}:
         join_transaction+0x164/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:315
         start_transaction+0x427/0x1a70 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:700
         btrfs_commit_super+0xa1/0x110 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4170
         close_ctree+0xcb0/0xf90 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4324
         generic_shutdown_super+0x159/0x3d0 fs/super.c:642
         kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1226
         btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2096
         deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473
         deactivate_super+0xde/0x100 fs/super.c:506
         cleanup_mnt+0x222/0x450 fs/namespace.c:1267
         task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:180
         resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline]
         exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline]
         __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline]
         syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x278/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x80/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:389
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  -> #1 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5468 [inline]
         lock_release+0x33e/0x6c0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5774
         percpu_up_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:99 [inline]
         __sb_end_write include/linux/fs.h:1650 [inline]
         sb_end_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1767 [inline]
         __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5ca/0x920 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1071
         btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x228/0x330 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301
         btrfs_evict_inode+0x960/0xe80 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5291
         evict+0x2ed/0x6c0 fs/inode.c:667
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         dput.part.0+0x4b1/0x9b0 fs/dcache.c:845
         dput+0x1f/0x30 fs/dcache.c:835
         ovl_stack_put+0x60/0x90 fs/overlayfs/util.c:132
         ovl_destroy_inode+0xc6/0x190 fs/overlayfs/super.c:182
         destroy_inode+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/inode.c:311
         iput_final fs/inode.c:1741 [inline]
         iput.part.0+0x5a8/0x7f0 fs/inode.c:1767
         iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1757
         dentry_unlink_inode+0x295/0x480 fs/dcache.c:400
         __dentry_kill+0x1d0/0x600 fs/dcache.c:603
         shrink_kill fs/dcache.c:1048 [inline]
         shrink_dentry_list+0x140/0x5d0 fs/dcache.c:1075
         prune_dcache_sb+0xeb/0x150 fs/dcache.c:1156
         super_cache_scan+0x32a/0x550 fs/super.c:221
         do_shrink_slab+0x44f/0x11c0 mm/shrinker.c:435
         shrink_slab_memcg mm/shrinker.c:548 [inline]
         shrink_slab+0xa87/0x1310 mm/shrinker.c:626
         shrink_one+0x493/0x7c0 mm/vmscan.c:4790
         shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4851 [inline]
         lru_gen_shrink_node+0x89f/0x1750 mm/vmscan.c:4951
         shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:5910 [inline]
         kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6720 [inline]
         balance_pgdat+0x1105/0x1970 mm/vmscan.c:6911
         kswapd+0x5ea/0xbf0 mm/vmscan.c:7180
         kthread+0x2c1/0x3a0 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244

  -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
         lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
         lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
         __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
         fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
         might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
         slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
         slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
         kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
         btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
         alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
         iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
         iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
         btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
         btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
         add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
         copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
         btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
         log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
         btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
         btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
         btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
         btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
         vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
         generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
         btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
         do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
         vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
         do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
         __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
         __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
         __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
         do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
         __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
         do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
         entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e

  other info that might help us debug this:

  Chain exists of:
    fs_reclaim --> btrfs_trans_num_extwriters --> &ei->log_mutex

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(&ei->log_mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs_trans_num_extwriters);
                                 lock(&ei->log_mutex);
    lock(fs_reclaim);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  7 locks held by syz-executor.1/9919:
   #0: ffff88802be20420 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:791 [inline]
   #1: ffff888065c0f8f0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#33){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xc8/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:385
   #2: ffff888065c0f778 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_inode_lock+0xee/0x110 fs/btrfs/inode.c:388
   #3: ffff88802be20610 (sb_internal#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_sync_file+0x95b/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1952
   #4: ffff8880546323f0 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #5: ffff888054632418 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x430/0xf40 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:290
   #6: ffff88804b569358 (&ei->log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_log_inode+0x39c/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6481

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 2 PID: 9919 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00361-g061d1af7b030 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:114
   check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x2478/0x3b30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
   lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 [inline]
   lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x560 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719
   __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3801 [inline]
   fs_reclaim_acquire+0x102/0x160 mm/page_alloc.c:3815
   might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:334 [inline]
   slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3891 [inline]
   slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3981 [inline]
   kmem_cache_alloc_lru_noprof+0x58/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:4020
   btrfs_alloc_inode+0x118/0xb20 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8411
   alloc_inode+0x5d/0x230 fs/inode.c:261
   iget5_locked fs/inode.c:1235 [inline]
   iget5_locked+0x1c9/0x2c0 fs/inode.c:1228
   btrfs_iget_locked fs/btrfs/inode.c:5590 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path fs/btrfs/inode.c:5607 [inline]
   btrfs_iget+0xfb/0x230 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5636
   add_conflicting_inode fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5657 [inline]
   copy_inode_items_to_log+0x1039/0x1e30 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:5928
   btrfs_log_inode+0xa48/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6592
   log_new_delayed_dentries fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6363 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode+0x27dd/0x4660 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6718
   btrfs_log_all_parents fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6833 [inline]
   btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x22ba/0x2a90 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7141
   btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x59/0x80 fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7180
   btrfs_sync_file+0x9c1/0xe10 fs/btrfs/file.c:1959
   vfs_fsync_range+0x141/0x230 fs/sync.c:188
   generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2794 [inline]
   btrfs_do_write_iter+0x584/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/file.c:1705
   do_iter_readv_writev+0x504/0x780 fs/read_write.c:741
   vfs_writev+0x36f/0xde0 fs/read_write.c:971
   do_pwritev+0x1b2/0x260 fs/read_write.c:1072
   __do_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1218 [inline]
   __se_compat_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1210 [inline]
   __ia32_compat_sys_pwritev2+0x121/0x1b0 fs/read_write.c:1210
   do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline]
   __do_fast_syscall_32+0x73/0x120 arch/x86/entry/common.c:386
   do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:411
   entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e
  RIP: 0023:0xf7334579
  Code: b8 01 10 06 03 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00000000f5f265ac EFLAGS: 00000292 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000017b
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00000000200002c0
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000292 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

Fix this by ensuring we are under a NOFS scope whenever we call
btrfs_iget() during inode logging and log replay.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Fixes: 712e36c ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL in btrfs_alloc_inode")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
The code in ocfs2_dio_end_io_write() estimates number of necessary
transaction credits using ocfs2_calc_extend_credits().  This however does
not take into account that the IO could be arbitrarily large and can
contain arbitrary number of extents.

Extent tree manipulations do often extend the current transaction but not
in all of the cases.  For example if we have only single block extents in
the tree, ocfs2_mark_extent_written() will end up calling
ocfs2_replace_extent_rec() all the time and we will never extend the
current transaction and eventually exhaust all the transaction credits if
the IO contains many single block extents.  Once that happens a
WARN_ON(jbd2_handle_buffer_credits(handle) <= 0) is triggered in
jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() and subsequently OCFS2 aborts in response to
this error.  This was actually triggered by one of our customers on a
heavily fragmented OCFS2 filesystem.

To fix the issue make sure the transaction always has enough credits for
one extent insert before each call of ocfs2_mark_extent_written().

Heming Zhao said:

------
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: OCFS2: (device dm-1): panic forced after error"

PID: xxx  TASK: xxxx  CPU: 5  COMMAND: "SubmitThread-CA"
  #0 machine_kexec at ffffffff8c069932
  #1 __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c1338fa
  #2 panic at ffffffff8c1d69b9
  #3 ocfs2_handle_error at ffffffffc0c86c0c [ocfs2]
  #4 __ocfs2_abort at ffffffffc0c88387 [ocfs2]
  #5 ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc0c51e98 [ocfs2]
  #6 ocfs2_split_extent at ffffffffc0c27ea3 [ocfs2]
  #7 ocfs2_change_extent_flag at ffffffffc0c28053 [ocfs2]
  #8 ocfs2_mark_extent_written at ffffffffc0c28347 [ocfs2]
  #9 ocfs2_dio_end_io_write at ffffffffc0c2bef9 [ocfs2]
#10 ocfs2_dio_end_io at ffffffffc0c2c0f5 [ocfs2]
#11 dio_complete at ffffffff8c2b9fa7
#12 do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff8c2bc09f
#13 ocfs2_direct_IO at ffffffffc0c2b653 [ocfs2]
#14 generic_file_direct_write at ffffffff8c1dcf14
#15 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff8c1dd07b
#16 ocfs2_file_write_iter at ffffffffc0c49f1f [ocfs2]
#17 aio_write at ffffffff8c2cc72e
#18 kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8c248dde
#19 do_io_submit at ffffffff8c2ccada
#20 do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8c004984
#21 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8c8000ba

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: c15471f ("ocfs2: fix sparse file & data ordering issue in direct io")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>
Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]>
Cc: Gang He <[email protected]>
Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kiryl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2024
Bos can be put with multiple unrelated dma-resv locks held. But
imported bos attempt to grab the bo dma-resv during dma-buf detach
that typically happens during cleanup. That leads to lockde splats
similar to the below and a potential ABBA deadlock.

Fix this by always taking the delayed workqueue cleanup path for
imported bos.

Requesting stable fixes from when the Xe driver was introduced,
since its usage of drm_exec and wide vm dma_resvs appear to be
the first reliable trigger of this.

[22982.116427] ============================================
[22982.116428] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[22982.116429] 6.10.0-rc2+ #10 Tainted: G     U  W
[22982.116430] --------------------------------------------
[22982.116430] glxgears:sh0/5785 is trying to acquire lock:
[22982.116431] ffff8c2bafa539a8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116438]
               but task is already holding lock:
[22982.116438] ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116442]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[22982.116442]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[22982.116443]        CPU0
[22982.116444]        ----
[22982.116444]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116445]   lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
[22982.116447]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[22982.116447]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

[22982.116448] 5 locks held by glxgears:sh0/5785:
[22982.116449]  #0: ffff8c2d9aba58c8 (&xef->vm.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: xe_file_close+0xde/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.116507]  #1: ffff8c2e28cc8480 (&vm->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: xe_vm_close_and_put+0x161/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.116578]  #2: ffff8c2e31982970 (&val->lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: xe_validation_ctx_init+0x6d/0x70 [xe]
[22982.116647]  #3: ffffacdc469478a8 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0x7f/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116716]  #4: ffff8c2d9aba6da8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_exec_lock_obj+0x49/0x2b0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116719]
               stack backtrace:
[22982.116720] CPU: 8 PID: 5785 Comm: glxgears:sh0 Tainted: G     U  W          6.10.0-rc2+ #10
[22982.116721] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 2001 02/01/2023
[22982.116723] Call Trace:
[22982.116724]  <TASK>
[22982.116725]  dump_stack_lvl+0x77/0xb0
[22982.116727]  __lock_acquire+0x1232/0x2160
[22982.116730]  lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.116732]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116734]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.116736]  __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0+0xd0/0x13b0
[22982.116738]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116741]  ? dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116743]  ? ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116745]  ww_mutex_lock+0x2b/0x90
[22982.116747]  dma_buf_detach+0x3b/0xf0
[22982.116749]  drm_prime_gem_destroy+0x2f/0x40 [drm]
[22982.116775]  xe_ttm_bo_destroy+0x32/0x220 [xe]
[22982.116818]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x3a/0x290
[22982.116821]  drm_exec_unlock_all+0xa1/0xd0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116823]  drm_exec_fini+0x12/0xb0 [drm_exec]
[22982.116824]  xe_validation_ctx_fini+0x15/0x40 [xe]
[22982.116892]  xe_vma_destroy_unlocked+0xb1/0xe0 [xe]
[22982.116959]  xe_vm_close_and_put+0x41a/0x9b0 [xe]
[22982.117025]  ? xa_find+0xe3/0x1e0
[22982.117028]  xe_file_close+0x10a/0x1c0 [xe]
[22982.117074]  drm_file_free+0x22a/0x280 [drm]
[22982.117099]  drm_release_noglobal+0x22/0x70 [drm]
[22982.117119]  __fput+0xf1/0x2d0
[22982.117122]  task_work_run+0x59/0x90
[22982.117125]  do_exit+0x330/0xb40
[22982.117127]  do_group_exit+0x36/0xa0
[22982.117129]  get_signal+0xbd2/0xbe0
[22982.117131]  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x3e/0x240
[22982.117134]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1e7/0x290
[22982.117137]  do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117139]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117140]  ? __set_task_comm+0x28/0x1e0
[22982.117141]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117144]  ? __set_task_comm+0xe1/0x1e0
[22982.117145]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117147]  ? __do_sys_prctl+0x245/0xab0
[22982.117149]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xde/0x190
[22982.117150]  ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xb0/0x290
[22982.117152]  ? do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x180
[22982.117154]  ? __lock_acquire+0x417/0x2160
[22982.117155]  ? reacquire_held_locks+0xd1/0x1f0
[22982.117156]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30c/0x790
[22982.117158]  ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2d0
[22982.117160]  ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[22982.117162]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x357/0x790
[22982.117163]  ? lock_release+0xca/0x290
[22982.117164]  ? do_user_addr_fault+0x361/0x790
[22982.117166]  ? trace_hardirqs_off+0x4b/0xc0
[22982.117168]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117170]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117172]  ? clear_bhb_loop+0x45/0xa0
[22982.117174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[22982.117176] RIP: 0033:0x7f943d267169
[22982.117192] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7f943d26713f.
[22982.117193] RSP: 002b:00007f9430bffc80 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
[22982.117195] RAX: fffffffffffffe00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f943d267169
[22982.117196] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000189 RDI: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117197] RBP: 00007f9430bffcb0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
[22982.117198] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[22982.117199] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005622f89579d0
[22982.117202]  </TASK>

Fixes: dd08ebf ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: <[email protected]> # v6.8+
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), but actually triggering such deadlocks is
beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved.
E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant
TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very
uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to
generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), but actually triggering such deadlocks is
beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved.
E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant
TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very
uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to
generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
rpedgeco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), but actually triggering such deadlocks is
beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved.
E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant
TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very
uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to
generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
rpedgeco pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), but actually triggering such deadlocks is
beyond rare due to the combination of dependencies and timings involved.
E.g. the cpufreq notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant
TSC, mucking with the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very
uncommon, and doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to
generate contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
fyin1 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2024
Use a dedicated mutex to guard kvm_usage_count to fix a potential deadlock
on x86 due to a chain of locks and SRCU synchronizations.  Translating the
below lockdep splat, CPU1 #6 will wait on CPU0 #1, CPU0 #8 will wait on
CPU2 #3, and CPU2 #7 will wait on CPU1 #4 (if there's a writer, due to the
fairness of r/w semaphores).

    CPU0                     CPU1                     CPU2
1   lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
2                                                     lock(&vcpu->mutex);
3                                                     lock(&kvm->srcu);
4                            lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
5                            lock(kvm_lock);
6                            lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
7                                                     lock(cpu_hotplug_lock);
8   sync(&kvm->srcu);

Note, there are likely more potential deadlocks in KVM x86, e.g. the same
pattern of taking cpu_hotplug_lock outside of kvm_lock likely exists with
__kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier():

  cpuhp_cpufreq_online()
  |
  -> cpufreq_online()
     |
     -> cpufreq_gov_performance_limits()
        |
        -> __cpufreq_driver_target()
           |
           -> __target_index()
              |
              -> cpufreq_freq_transition_begin()
                 |
                 -> cpufreq_notify_transition()
                    |
                    -> ... __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier()

But, actually triggering such deadlocks is beyond rare due to the
combination of dependencies and timings involved.  E.g. the cpufreq
notifier is only used on older CPUs without a constant TSC, mucking with
the NX hugepage mitigation while VMs are running is very uncommon, and
doing so while also onlining/offlining a CPU (necessary to generate
contention on cpu_hotplug_lock) would be even more unusual.

The most robust solution to the general cpu_hotplug_lock issue is likely
to switch vm_list to be an RCU-protected list, e.g. so that x86's cpufreq
notifier doesn't to take kvm_lock.  For now, settle for fixing the most
blatant deadlock, as switching to an RCU-protected list is a much more
involved change, but add a comment in locking.rst to call out that care
needs to be taken when walking holding kvm_lock and walking vm_list.

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.10.0-smp--c257535a0c9d-pip #330 Tainted: G S         O
  ------------------------------------------------------
  tee/35048 is trying to acquire lock:
  ff6a80eced71e0a8 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffc07abb08 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: set_nx_huge_pages+0x14a/0x1e0 [kvm]

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #3 (kvm_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         kvm_dev_ioctl+0x4fb/0xe50 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #2 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}:
         cpus_read_lock+0x2e/0xb0
         static_key_slow_inc+0x16/0x30
         kvm_lapic_set_base+0x6a/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_apic_base+0x8f/0xe0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_msr_common+0x9ae/0xf80 [kvm]
         vmx_set_msr+0xa54/0xbe0 [kvm_intel]
         __kvm_set_msr+0xb6/0x1a0 [kvm]
         kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0xeca/0x10c0 [kvm]
         kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x485/0x5b0 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #1 (&kvm->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}:
         __synchronize_srcu+0x44/0x1a0
         synchronize_srcu_expedited+0x21/0x30
         kvm_swap_active_memslots+0x110/0x1c0 [kvm]
         kvm_set_memslot+0x360/0x620 [kvm]
         __kvm_set_memory_region+0x27b/0x300 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region+0x43/0x60 [kvm]
         kvm_vm_ioctl+0x295/0x650 [kvm]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0xd0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x21/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x15d0/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

  -> #0 (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         __lock_acquire+0x15ef/0x2e30
         lock_acquire+0xe0/0x260
         __mutex_lock+0x6a/0xb40
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
         set_nx_huge_pages+0x179/0x1e0 [kvm]
         param_attr_store+0x93/0x100
         module_attr_store+0x22/0x40
         sysfs_kf_write+0x81/0xb0
         kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x133/0x1d0
         vfs_write+0x28d/0x380
         ksys_write+0x70/0xe0
         __x64_sys_write+0x1f/0x30
         x64_sys_call+0x281b/0x2e60
         do_syscall_64+0x83/0x160
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

Cc: Chao Gao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 0bf5049 ("KVM: Drop kvm_count_lock and instead protect kvm_usage_count with kvm_lock")
Cc: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Farrah Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
Syzkaller reported a lockdep splat:

  ============================================
  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0 Not tainted
  --------------------------------------------
  syz-executor364/5113 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  ffff8880449f1958 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
  ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  other info that might help us debug this:
   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0
         ----
    lock(k-slock-AF_INET);
    lock(k-slock-AF_INET);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

   May be due to missing lock nesting notation

  7 locks held by syz-executor364/5113:
   #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
   #0: ffff8880449f0e18 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg+0x153/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1806
   #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1607 [inline]
   #1: ffff88803fe39ad8 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x11f/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1727
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #2: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __ip_queue_xmit+0x5f/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:470
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #3: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x45f/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:228
   #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: local_lock_acquire include/linux/local_lock_internal.h:29 [inline]
   #4: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: process_backlog+0x33b/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6104
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:326 [inline]
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:838 [inline]
   #5: ffffffff8e938320 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_local_deliver_finish+0x230/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:232
   #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
   #6: ffff88803fe3cb58 (k-slock-AF_INET){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5113 Comm: syz-executor364 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc6-syzkaller-00019-g67784a74e258 #0
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:93 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:119
   check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061 [inline]
   validate_chain+0x15d3/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3855
   __lock_acquire+0x137a/0x2040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5142
   lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5759
   __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
   _raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
   spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
   sk_clone_lock+0x2cd/0xf40 net/core/sock.c:2328
   mptcp_sk_clone_init+0x32/0x13c0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:3279
   subflow_syn_recv_sock+0x931/0x1920 net/mptcp/subflow.c:874
   tcp_check_req+0xfe4/0x1a20 net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:853
   tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x37f0 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:2267
   ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x22e/0x440 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:205
   ip_local_deliver_finish+0x341/0x5f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:233
   NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
   NF_HOOK+0x3a4/0x450 include/linux/netfilter.h:314
   __netif_receive_skb_one_core net/core/dev.c:5661 [inline]
   __netif_receive_skb+0x2bf/0x650 net/core/dev.c:5775
   process_backlog+0x662/0x15b0 net/core/dev.c:6108
   __napi_poll+0xcb/0x490 net/core/dev.c:6772
   napi_poll net/core/dev.c:6841 [inline]
   net_rx_action+0x89b/0x1240 net/core/dev.c:6963
   handle_softirqs+0x2c4/0x970 kernel/softirq.c:554
   do_softirq+0x11b/0x1e0 kernel/softirq.c:455
   </IRQ>
   <TASK>
   __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1bb/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:382
   local_bh_enable include/linux/bottom_half.h:33 [inline]
   rcu_read_unlock_bh include/linux/rcupdate.h:908 [inline]
   __dev_queue_xmit+0x1763/0x3e90 net/core/dev.c:4450
   dev_queue_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:3105 [inline]
   neigh_hh_output include/net/neighbour.h:526 [inline]
   neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:540 [inline]
   ip_finish_output2+0xd41/0x1390 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:235
   ip_local_out net/ipv4/ip_output.c:129 [inline]
   __ip_queue_xmit+0x118c/0x1b80 net/ipv4/ip_output.c:535
   __tcp_transmit_skb+0x2544/0x3b30 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:1466
   tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6542 [inline]
   tcp_rcv_state_process+0x2c32/0x4570 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6729
   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77d/0xc70 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1934
   sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1111 [inline]
   __release_sock+0x214/0x350 net/core/sock.c:3004
   release_sock+0x61/0x1f0 net/core/sock.c:3558
   mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen+0x1ad/0x530 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1733
   mptcp_sendmsg+0x1884/0x1b10 net/mptcp/protocol.c:1812
   sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
   __sock_sendmsg+0x1a6/0x270 net/socket.c:745
   ____sys_sendmsg+0x525/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2597
   ___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2651 [inline]
   __sys_sendmmsg+0x3b2/0x740 net/socket.c:2737
   __do_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2766 [inline]
   __se_sys_sendmmsg net/socket.c:2763 [inline]
   __x64_sys_sendmmsg+0xa0/0xb0 net/socket.c:2763
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
  RIP: 0033:0x7f04fb13a6b9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 01 1a 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
  RSP: 002b:00007ffd651f42d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000133
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f04fb13a6b9
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000d00 RDI: 0000000000000004
  RBP: 00007ffd651f4310 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
  R10: 0000000020000080 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000000f4240
  R13: 00007f04fb187449 R14: 00007ffd651f42f4 R15: 00007ffd651f4300
   </TASK>

As noted by Cong Wang, the splat is false positive, but the code
path leading to the report is an unexpected one: a client is
attempting an MPC handshake towards the in-kernel listener created
by the in-kernel PM for a port based signal endpoint.

Such connection will be never accepted; many of them can make the
listener queue full and preventing the creation of MPJ subflow via
such listener - its intended role.

Explicitly detect this scenario at initial-syn time and drop the
incoming MPC request.

Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f4aacdfef2c6a6529c3e
Cc: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Hou Tao says:

====================
The patch set fixes several issues in bits iterator. Patch #1 fixes the
kmemleak problem of bits iterator. Patch #2~#3 fix the overflow problem
of nr_bits. Patch #4 fixes the potential stack corruption when bits
iterator is used on 32-bit host. Patch #5 adds more test cases for bits
iterator.

Please see the individual patches for more details. And comments are
always welcome.
---
v4:
 * patch #1: add ack from Yafang
 * patch #3: revert code-churn like changes:
   (1) compute nr_bytes and nr_bits before the check of nr_words.
   (2) use nr_bits == 64 to check for single u64, preventing build
       warning on 32-bit hosts.
 * patch #4: use "BITS_PER_LONG == 32" instead of "!defined(CONFIG_64BIT)"

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#t
  * split the bits-iterator related patches from "Misc fixes for bpf"
    patch set
  * patch #1: use "!nr_bits || bits >= nr_bits" to stop the iteration
  * patch #2: add a new helper for the overflow problem
  * patch #3: decrease the limitation from 512 to 511 and check whether
    nr_bytes is too large for bpf memory allocator explicitly
  * patch #5: add two more test cases for bit iterator

v2: http://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
kaihuang pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2024
Petr Machata says:

====================
mlxsw: Fixes

In this patchset:

- Tx header should be pushed for each packet which is transmitted via
  Spectrum ASICs. Patch #1 adds a missing call to skb_cow_head() to make
  sure that there is both enough room to push the Tx header and that the
  SKB header is not cloned and can be modified.

- Commit b5b60bb ("mlxsw: pci: Use page pool for Rx buffers
  allocation") converted mlxsw to use page pool for Rx buffers allocation.
  Sync for CPU and for device should be done for Rx pages. In patches #2
  and #3, add the missing calls to sync pages for, respectively, CPU and
  the device.

- Patch #4 then fixes a bug to IPv6 GRE forwarding offload. Patch #5 adds
  a generic forwarding test that fails with mlxsw ports prior to the fix.
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ahunter6 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Intel TDX protects guest VM's from malicious host and certain physical
attacks.  TDX introduces a new operation mode, Secure Arbitration Mode
(SEAM) to isolate and protect guest VM's.  A TDX guest VM runs in SEAM and,
unlike VMX, direct control and interaction with the guest by the host VMM
is not possible.  Instead, Intel TDX Module, which also runs in SEAM,
provides a SEAMCALL API.

The SEAMCALL that provides the ability to enter a guest is TDH.VP.ENTER.
The TDX Module processes TDH.VP.ENTER, and enters the guest via VMX
VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME instructions.  When a guest VM-exit requires host VMM
interaction, the TDH.VP.ENTER SEAMCALL returns to the host VMM (KVM).

Add tdh_vp_enter() to wrap the SEAMCALL invocation of TDH.VP.ENTER.

TDH.VP.ENTER is different from other SEAMCALLS in several ways:
- it may take some time to return as the guest executes
- it uses more arguments
- after it returns some host state may need to be restored

TDH.VP.ENTER arguments are passed through General Purpose Registers (GPRs).
For the special case of the TD guest invoking TDG.VP.VMCALL, nearly any GPR
can be used, as well as XMM0 to XMM15. Notably, RBP is not used, and Linux
mandates the TDX Module feature NO_RBP_MOD, which is enforced elsewhere.
Additionally, XMM registers are not required for the existing Guest
Hypervisor Communication Interface and are handled by existing KVM code
should they be modified by the guest.

There are 2 input formats and 5 output formats for TDH.VP.ENTER arguments.
Input #1 : Initial entry or following a previous async. TD Exit
Input #2 : Following a previous TDCALL(TDG.VP.VMCALL)
Output #1 : On Error (No TD Entry)
Output #2 : Async. Exits with a VMX Architectural Exit Reason
Output #3 : Async. Exits with a non-VMX TD Exit Status
Output #4 : Async. Exits with Cross-TD Exit Details
Output #5 : On TDCALL(TDG.VP.VMCALL)

Currently, to keep things simple, the wrapper function does not attempt
to support different formats, and just passes all the GPRs that could be
used.  The GPR values are held by KVM in the area set aside for guest
GPRs.  KVM code uses the guest GPR area (vcpu->arch.regs[]) to set up for
or process results of tdh_vp_enter().

Therefore changing tdh_vp_enter() to use more complex argument formats
would also alter the way KVM code interacts with tdh_vp_enter().

Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]>
---

-Kai:
 - This is not nice, but for now have no clue on improvement.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant