Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CHEF-MAGIC-MODULE-secretmanagerregional-Secret - Resource Implementation #657

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abheda-crest
Copy link

@abheda-crest abheda-crest commented Oct 21, 2024

Automatically generated by magic modules for service: secretmanagerregional and resource: Secret
This commit includes the following changes:

  • Singular Resource
  • Plural Resource
  • Documentation updates
  • Integration tests

We have tested the controls to verify the following fields of the regional secrets:

  • create_time
  • expire_time
  • version_destroy_ttl
  • labels
  • annotations
  • name
  • rotation
    • next_rotation_time
    • rotation_period
  • customer_managed_encryption
    • kms_key_name
  • topics

More information about regional secrets: https://cloud.google.com/secret-manager/regional-secrets/data-residency

@abheda-crest abheda-crest requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2024 09:25
…gional and resource: Secret

Signed-off-by: abheda-crest <[email protected]>
@abheda-crest abheda-crest force-pushed the CHEF-MAGIC-MODULE-secretmanagerregional-Secret branch from dd2e481 to 866c2bf Compare October 21, 2024 09:26
Signed-off-by: abheda-crest <[email protected]>
@abheda-crest abheda-crest force-pushed the CHEF-MAGIC-MODULE-secretmanagerregional-Secret branch from 4d71654 to 33fe200 Compare October 21, 2024 09:57
@jainildesai-crest
Copy link

Need a review on this PR, @balasubramanian-s can you help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants