generated from hmcts/spring-boot-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update mockito monorepo to v5 (major) #17
Open
renovate
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
April 11, 2023 21:15
a785969
to
267d6ab
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
3 times, most recently
from
April 24, 2023 15:53
fb302d5
to
cd2610f
Compare
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
4 times, most recently
from
June 28, 2023 12:44
4796d5b
to
848e08b
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
20 times, most recently
from
July 5, 2023 15:43
5af229f
to
a2a7197
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 21, 2024 10:44
cf74480
to
68ae369
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
May 23, 2024 15:13
68ae369
to
e01810f
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
4 times, most recently
from
June 10, 2024 11:42
1f158d5
to
6fd18d9
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
5 times, most recently
from
June 13, 2024 11:16
36ccf19
to
c07dfcd
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
4 times, most recently
from
June 21, 2024 08:05
6c65b22
to
4ef1a38
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
June 27, 2024 14:49
4ef1a38
to
4ecde48
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
July 23, 2024 14:53
4ecde48
to
4fcbc8d
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
August 9, 2024 10:03
4fcbc8d
to
f72aa61
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
August 28, 2024 05:39
f72aa61
to
e2b4a24
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
September 4, 2024 09:51
e2b4a24
to
2afe465
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 1, 2024 02:49
c255e87
to
722bfb0
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
October 17, 2024 00:01
722bfb0
to
b78f0b9
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
November 25, 2024 10:05
b78f0b9
to
052e51c
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 12, 2024 17:31
24e0b0a
to
cab1eac
Compare
renovate
bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/major-mockito-monorepo
branch
from
January 3, 2025 11:39
cab1eac
to
a31044e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
4.8.1
->5.2.0
4.8.1
->5.15.2
4.2.0
->5.15.2
Release Notes
mockito/mockito (org.mockito:mockito-inline)
v5.2.0
Compare Source
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
5.2.0
v5.1.1
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
5.1.1
v5.1.0
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
5.1.0
CONTRIBUTING.md
(#2870)CONTRIBUTING.md
(#2868)Mockito#{mock,spy}(T... reified)
with@SafeVarargs
(#2866)v5.0.0
Mockito 5: prepare for future JDK versions
For a while now, we have seen an increase in problems/incompatibilities with recent versions of the JDK due to our usage of JVM-internal API.
Most notably, JDK 17 made some changes which are incompatible with the current subclass mockmaker.
Therefore, to prepare for the future of JDK, we are making some core changes to ensure Mockito keeps on working.
Switch the default mockmaker to
mockito-inline
Back in Mockito 2.7.6, we published a new mockmaker based on the "inline bytecode" principle.
This mockmaker creates mocks manipulating bytecode equivalent within the original class such that its method implementations hook into the normal Mockito machinery.
As a comparison, the subclass mockmaker generates "real" subclasses for mocks, to mimic the same behavior.
While the approaches are similar, the inline mockmaker avoids certain restrictions that the JDK imposes.
For example, it does not violate module boundaries (introduced in JDK 9, but more heavily used in JDK 17) and avoids the leaking of the creation of the subclass.
Massive thanks to community member @reta who implemented this change.
Note: this does not affect
mockito-android
nor testing on Android.When should I still be using the subclass mockmaker?
There are legitimate remaining use cases for the subclass mockmaker.
For example, on the Graal VM's native image, the inline mockmaker will not work and the subclass mockmaker is the appropriate choice.
Additionally, if you would like to avoid mocking final classes, using the subclass mockmaker is a possibibility.
Note however that if you solely want to use the subclass mockmaker to avoid mocking final, you will run into the above mentioned issues on JDK 17+.
We want to leave this choice up to our users, which is why we will keep on supporting the subclass mockmaker.
If you want to use the subclass mockmaker instead, you can use the new
mockito-subclass
artifact (published on Maven Central along with all our other artifacts).Update the minimum supported Java version to 11
Mockito 4 supports Java 8 and above.
Similar to other open source projects, we are moving away from JDK 8 and to newer versions.
The primary reason for moving away from JDK 8 is the increasing maintenance costs with keeping our own infrastructure working.
Lately we have been running into more and more JDK 8 breakages.
Additionally, while we want to support the newest JDK API's, our current solution to support both JDK 8 and newer versions causes issues with the
SecurityManager
.Since we want Mockito to work on the newest version and more and more businesses adopting JDK 11, we have decided to make the switch as well.
Massive thanks to community member @reta who implemented this change.
What should I do if I still run JDK 8?
For JDK 8 and below, you can keep on using Mockito 4.
This is similar to if you are using JDK 6, for which you can keep on using Mockito 2.
The changes in Mockito 5 (for now) are primarily focused on the latest JDK versions, which means the API differences between Mockito 4 and 5 are minimal.
However, over time this will most likely widen, so we do recommend adopting JDK 11 in the future.
New
type()
method onArgumentMatcher
One of our most used public API's for customizing Mockito is the
ArgumentMatcher
interface.The interface allows you to define a custom matcher, which you can pass into method arguments to provide more targeted matches.
One major shortcoming of the
ArgumentMatcher
was the lack of varargs support.There were many, many issues filed related to varargs and Mockito unable to handle them.
Community member @big-andy-coates put in a lot of effort to come up with an appropriate solution, including fully implementing and comparing 2 approaches.
Ultimately, we decided that introducing a new
type()
method onArgumentMatcher
is the best solution.As a result, it is now possible to update your custom matchers to implement varargs support, if you so desire.
Note that
ArgumentMatcher
is still a@FunctionalInterface
and can therefore still be written as a lambda.Massive thanks to community member @big-andy-coates who implemented this change.
What is the effect of this new method?
For varargs methods, there was previously a way to only match zero arguments, or two or more arguments, by using the exact number of matchers, i.e.
But following the pattern to match exactly one argument:
doesn't work, as
any
is "vararg aware", so Mockito matched theany
against each element of the varargs parameter, meaning it will match any number of arguments, i.e. the above would of matched all of these:With the new
type
method, it's now possible to differentiate matching calls with any exact number of arguments, or to match any number of arguments.Therefore, if you want to match 0 or more arguments, use
any(String[].class)
.If you want to match an exact number of arguments, use
any(String.class)
(and specify as manyany
matchers as arguments you want to match on).In a similar fashion, the behavior of
ArgumentCaptor.forClass
has changed as well.If you want to capture all arguments, use an
ArgumentCaptor
forString[]
, otherwiseString
:For more information, see the description and conversation in pull request 2835 and pull request 2807.
At the same time,
ArgumentCaptor
is now fully type-aware.This allows for capturing specific subclasses on a generic method:
Do I need to implement this new method?
No, you don't need to.
Mockito 5 declares a default implementation, returning
Void.type
as the type of anArgumentMatcher
.This essentially means that Mockito will not consider the type when handling varargs.
However, if you do return a specific type, Mockito will consider this when matching arguments.
As a result, this new method is not a source-breaking change, but is a bytecode-breaking change.
All code working on Mockito 4 should work as-is when recompiled with Mockito 5.
v4.11.0
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
4.11.0
any(String[].class)
doesn't work as expected (#2796)v4.10.0
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
4.10.0
MatcherApplicationStrategy
(#2803)v4.9.0
Changelog generated by Shipkit Changelog Gradle Plugin
4.9.0
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.