feat: make demo more responsive #173
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying augurs with
|
| Latest commit: |
3bc1e08
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://7a48428f.augurs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://make-demo-responsive.augurs.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
demo/helpers.js (2)
2-2: LGTM! Consider additional breakpoints for larger screens.The dynamic margin adjustment based on screen width is a good approach for improving responsiveness. The breakpoint at 768px and the corresponding margin values (30px for mobile, 100px for larger screens) are reasonable choices.
Consider adding another breakpoint for very large screens (e.g., >1440px) where a larger margin might be aesthetically beneficial.
6-7: Consider edge cases and improve maintainability.The width and height calculations are logical, but could benefit from some improvements.
Consider:
- Adding a minimum width constraint
- Moving magic numbers to named constants
- Adding JSDoc comments to explain the sizing rationale
+ const MIN_WIDTH = 320; // Minimum width for most mobile devices + const MAX_WIDTH = 1100; // Maximum content width + return { - width: Math.min(window.innerWidth - margin, 1100), + width: Math.min(Math.max(window.innerWidth - margin, MIN_WIDTH), MAX_WIDTH), height: window.innerHeight / denominator, };demo/index.html (2)
69-85: Consider consolidating media queries for better maintainability.There are multiple media query blocks for the same breakpoints (768px, 480px) scattered throughout the CSS. Consider consolidating them to improve maintainability.
Example consolidation:
@media screen and (max-width: 768px) { .plot { height: calc(100vh / 3); padding: 0.5rem; width: 100%; } #app { max-width: 100%; overflow-x: hidden; } .center { padding: 0; } + .params { + flex-direction: column; + align-items: stretch; + } + + .param { + margin: 0.5rem 0; + } + + h1 { + font-size: 2rem; + } + + body { + padding: 0 15px; + } } @media screen and (max-width: 480px) { .plot { height: calc(100vh / 2.5); padding: 0.25rem; } + h1 { + font-size: 1.75rem; + } + + h2 { + font-size: 1.25rem; + } + + input[type="range"] { + width: 100%; + min-width: unset; + } + + datalist { + width: 100%; + } }Also applies to: 87-92, 129-150, 153-174
54-54: Consider using CSS custom properties for plot heights.The plot height calculations are repeated across different media queries. Consider using CSS custom properties to maintain consistency and make updates easier.
Example implementation:
+:root { + --plot-height-desktop: calc(100vh / 4); + --plot-height-tablet: calc(100vh / 3); + --plot-height-mobile: calc(100vh / 2.5); +} .plot { - height: calc(100vh / 4); + height: var(--plot-height-desktop); } @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { .plot { - height: calc(100vh / 3); + height: var(--plot-height-tablet); } } @media screen and (max-width: 480px) { .plot { - height: calc(100vh / 2.5); + height: var(--plot-height-mobile); } }Also applies to: 71-71, 89-89, 140-140, 163-163
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
demo/helpers.js(1 hunks)demo/index.html(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
demo/helpers.js (1)
1-8: Verify consistent responsive behavior across the demo.
Let's ensure the responsive changes are consistently applied across the demo implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Responsive breakpoints and dimensions are consistently applied across the demo
The verification shows consistent responsive behavior:
- Breakpoints (480px and 768px) in
index.htmlmatch the ones inhelpers.js - Responsive padding adjustments (20px → 15px) align with margin changes (100px → 30px)
- Max-width constraints are properly set (1200px container, 1100px content)
- All dimension-related values serve clear responsive purposes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential hardcoded dimensions or related responsive issues
# Look for hardcoded pixel values in demo files
echo "Checking for hardcoded dimensions in demo files..."
rg -g 'demo/*' '\d+px'
# Look for related size calculations
echo "Checking for related size calculations..."
rg -g 'demo/*' 'innerWidth|innerHeight'
# Look for media queries to ensure consistent breakpoints
echo "Checking for media query breakpoints..."
rg -g 'demo/*' '@media.*\b(480|768)\b'
Length of output: 1499
demo/index.html (4)
4-5: LGTM! Proper viewport configuration for responsive design.
The viewport meta tag is correctly configured with width=device-width and initial-scale=1.0, which is essential for responsive design.
53-67: LGTM! Good responsive design for plots.
The .plot class is well-configured with responsive properties and proper overflow handling.
211-434: LGTM! Well-structured and semantic HTML.
The HTML structure follows best practices with proper semantic elements, consistent class naming, and good heading hierarchy.
Line range hint 3-437: Verify responsive design testing across different devices.
While the responsive design implementation looks good, please ensure it has been tested across various devices and orientations.
✅ Verification successful
Responsive design implementation follows best practices
The code shows a well-structured responsive design with:
- Consistent breakpoints at 768px and 480px across all media queries
- Fluid layouts using relative units (vh, %, rem)
- Appropriate viewport meta tag
- Responsive adjustments for plot heights and spacing
- Flexible input controls that adapt to screen size
The only fixed widths are:
max-width: 1200pxon body (reasonable constraint for readability)min-width: 200pxon form controls (ensures usable input size)width: 210pxon datalist (matches input width)
These fixed values are appropriately used as constraints rather than rigid dimensions and don't impact the responsive behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for viewport-specific CSS and potential responsive design issues
# Check for any hardcoded pixel values that might affect responsiveness
echo "Checking for potentially problematic fixed pixel values..."
rg -i 'px(?!;|\s+and)' --type html
# Check for potential responsive design issues
echo "Checking for potential responsive design issues..."
rg -i '(position:\s*fixed|width:\s*\d+px|height:\s*\d+px)' --type html
# Check if all media query breakpoints are consistent
echo "Checking media query breakpoints for consistency..."
rg -i '@media.*\(.*width' --type html
Length of output: 1453
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation