Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix benchmark integration script #1504

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman commented Sep 28, 2022

The previous model used a submodule that was never updated and thus the stuff copied from oss-fuzz repo was very old and generally not working. Change this to use the latest oss-fuzz clone.

@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC @maxammann
Related: #1353

@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2022
@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is blocking #1441

Copy link

@maxammann maxammann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks good to me! I was actually quite puzzled why there is a submodule :)

There is ofc never a guarantee that integration works. Most of the time only minior tweaks will be necessary I think.

Did not test this yet though.

@maxammann
Copy link

Like you said in Discord: It might be a good idea to remove this script. Most of the time this will not easily work. And frankly, without understanding what is going on, how benchmarks are built, which tools they use, just copying it is very dangerous.

I think it would be good to "force" users going the more complicated way of manually creating a new benchmark.

@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman merged commit 7132a8f into master Oct 3, 2022
@jonathanmetzman jonathanmetzman deleted the oss-fuzz-benchmark branch October 3, 2022 21:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants