Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More permissive schemas for dbt Cloud manifest #270

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2024

Conversation

pgoslatara
Copy link
Member

Resolves #

Problem

Solution

Checklist

  • I have run this code in development, and it appears to resolve the stated issue.
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required or relevant for this PR.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
src/dbt_bouncer
   config_file_validator.py95298%138, 144
   runner.py76495%131, 167–168, 226
   utils.py1011981%42, 47, 136–154, 177
src/dbt_bouncer/artifact_parsers
   parsers_common.py48198%61
   parsers_manifest.py86495%176, 178, 186, 261
   parsers_run_results.py34391%67, 69, 72
src/dbt_bouncer/checks/manifest
   check_models.py199199%533
   check_unit_tests.py47394%102, 153, 205
src/dbt_bouncer/checks/run_results
   check_run_results.py19289%92–93
TOTAL40033999% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
1 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 8.303s ⏱️

@pgoslatara pgoslatara merged commit 67f2762 into main Oct 5, 2024
14 checks passed
@pgoslatara pgoslatara deleted the more-premissive-dbt-cloud-schema branch October 5, 2024 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant