Add post about MVC MVP MVVM

_posts/2024-04-22- MVC-MVP-MVVM.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+---
+title: Building Your Android App (MVC vs. MVP vs. MVVM) - A Smackdown
+date: 2024-04-12 12:29:00 +0800
+categories: [Tech]
+tags: [Architecture, Android]
+render_with_liquid: false
+---
+
+
+The realm of Android app development empowers you to craft exceptional applications. But with this power comes a crucial decision: selecting the right architectural pattern. Three prominent contenders in this arena are MVC (Model-View-Controller), MVP (Model-View-Presenter), and MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel). Each offers distinct advantages and caters to projects of varying complexity. Let's delve into their functionalities to determine which one reigns supreme for your next Android masterpiece.
+
+### The OG on the Block: MVC (Model-View-Controller)
+
+MVC, the granddaddy of them all, is a well-established pattern that separates your app into three distinct layers:
+
+* **Model:** The heart of your app, it encapsulates the data and business logic.
+* **View:** The visual representation of the data, responsible for UI elements and user interaction.
+* **Controller:** The glue that binds them, handling user interactions, updating the Model, and notifying the View of changes.
+
+### MVC's Strengths
+
+* Simplicity: Easy to grasp for beginners due to its clear separation of concerns.
+* Widely Adopted: Abundant resources and learning materials available.
+* Testable Model: The Model can be unit tested in isolation.
+
+### MVC's Weaknesses
+
+* Tight Coupling: View and Controller are tightly linked, making UI changes impact the Controller and vice versa. This can become a maintenance nightmare in complex apps.
+* Fat Controller: The Controller can become overloaded with UI logic, reducing its testability and manageability.
+* Limited UI Logic Testability: Testing UI logic within the Controller can be challenging.
+
+
+### The Charmer: MVP (Model-View-Presenter)
+
+MVP introduces a new layer, the Presenter, to address the shortcomings of MVC:
+
+* **Model:** Same as MVC, holds the data and business logic.
+* **View:** Responsible for UI and user interactions, but doesn't contain any logic (think of it as a passive component).
+* **Presenter:** The mediator, handling user interactions, updating the Model, and notifying the View of changes. It decouples the View and Controller, improving maintainability.
+
+### MVP's Allure
+
+* Improved Separation: Clearer separation of concerns between UI, data, and presentation logic.
+* Testable UI Logic: The Presenter can be easily unit tested in isolation.
+* Flexible View Implementation: The View can be easily replaced without affecting the Presenter or Model.
+
+### But Don't Be Blinded by the Charm
+
+* Increased Complexity: Introducing the Presenter adds another layer, with a potentially steeper learning curve.
+* Boilerplate Code: Setting up Presenters and their interactions can involve some repetitive code.
+
+
+### The New Sheriff in Town: MVVM (Model-View-ViewModel)
+
+MVVM takes separation to the next level, introducing a ViewModel to manage UI data and logic:
+
+* **Model:** Responsible for data sources. It collaborates with ViewModel for data access (get/save).
+* **View:** Responsible for UI display and user interactions, but doesn't contain any logic or data binding.
+* **ViewModel:** Acts as the single source of truth for the View, handling data preparation, presentation logic, and notifying the View of changes. It leverages data binding frameworks for seamless UI updates.
+
+### MVVM's Merits
+
+* Clean Separation: Strongest separation between UI, data, and presentation logic, leading to excellent maintainability and testability.
+* Bidirectional Data Binding: Frameworks like Data Binding Library simplify data flow between View and ViewModel.
+* Testable UI Logic: The ViewModel can be easily unit tested.
+
+### Is MVVM Always the Right Choice?
+
+* Steeper Learning Curve: Understanding data binding and interactions between View, ViewModel, and Model can be challenging for beginners.
+* Potential Over-engineering: MVVM might be overkill for very simple apps.
+
+
+### Choosing Your Architectural Champion
+
+The ideal architecture pattern depends on your project's complexity and team's experience:
+
+* Simple Apps: MVC can be a good starting point due to its simplicity.
+* Medium-Sized Apps: MVP offers a good balance between maintainability and complexity.
+* Complex Apps: MVVM provides the cleanest separation and best testability.
+
+Remember, these are just guidelines. Consider your specific project needs and team expertise when making your decision. No matter which pattern you choose, a well-structured architecture will keep your Android app healthy and scalable for the future.