Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STRWEB-90 omit css alias cruft #126

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

STRWEB-90 omit css alias cruft #126

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

zburke
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke commented Oct 9, 2023

Don't manipulate config.resolve.extensions for the benefit of CSS because it appears we're not actually leveraging it anywhere. Additional spot-testing across a variety of applications doesn't show any of the odd problems we saw when we first tried to clean this up in STRWEB-85.

Refs STRWEB-90

Don't manipulate `config.resolve.extensions` for the benefit of CSS
because it appears we're not actually leveraging it anywhere. Additional
spot-testing across a variety of applications doesn't show any of the
odd problems we saw when we first tried to clean this up in STRWEB-85.

Refs STRWEB-90
@zburke zburke requested review from JohnC-80, EthanFreestone and a team October 9, 2023 19:45
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit 9b69012. ± Comparison against base commit fe37a9c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

73 tests  ±0   73 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
39 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
  1 files   ±0     0 ±0 

Results for commit 9b69012. ± Comparison against base commit fe37a9c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@artem-blazhko artem-blazhko requested a review from a team October 24, 2023 10:40
@zburke
Copy link
Member Author

zburke commented Oct 24, 2023

@JohnC-80, @EthanFreestone, I would love for you two to weigh in on this.

@EthanFreestone
Copy link

@JohnC-80, @EthanFreestone, I would love for you two to weigh in on this.

Apologies for the later reply, only just saw this. Change looks good to me, have tested locally without incident so AFAIC it's good to go :D

@zburke
Copy link
Member Author

zburke commented Nov 1, 2023

Thanks, @EthanFreestone. Can you or @JohnC-80 also approve #130 so I can get the version bumped on master? I'll merge this as soon as that is taken care of.

@EthanFreestone
Copy link

Thanks, @EthanFreestone. Can you or @JohnC-80 also approve #130 so I can get the version bumped on master? I'll merge this as soon as that is taken care of.

Have approved the version bump :)

@zburke zburke merged commit 6a08438 into master Nov 13, 2023
4 checks passed
@zburke zburke deleted the STRWEB-90 branch November 13, 2023 20:51
@zburke zburke restored the STRWEB-90 branch November 13, 2023 20:54
@zburke zburke deleted the STRWEB-90 branch December 12, 2023 03:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants