Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STSMACOM-879 Use this.resources in StripesConnectedSource instead of accessing props directly. #1544

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

BogdanDenis
Copy link
Contributor

Description

StripesConnectedSource can accept either parentResources or resources and one of them can be undefined. Because of this we should use this.resources instead, which takes this into account

Screenshots

chrome_pMMEOXrGvn.mp4

Issues

STSMACOM-879

@BogdanDenis BogdanDenis requested review from Dmytro-Melnyshyn and a team November 28, 2024 13:40
Copy link

Bigtest Unit Test Results

  1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   14s ⏱️ ±0s
508 tests ±0  466 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
510 runs  ±0  468 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 3bc5b9f. ± Comparison against base commit cc948c9.

@Dmytro-Melnyshyn Dmytro-Melnyshyn requested a review from a team November 28, 2024 13:44
@BogdanDenis BogdanDenis merged commit 3fd7f0c into master Nov 28, 2024
15 checks passed
@BogdanDenis BogdanDenis deleted the STSMACOM-879 branch November 28, 2024 14:17
zburke pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
… of accessing props directly. (#1544)

`StripesConnectedSource` can accept either `parentResources` or
`resources` and one of them can be undefined. Because of this we should
use `this.resources` instead, which takes this into account

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec30f55d-c9b2-4643-afd6-ca3d663eb68b

[STSMACOM-879](https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/STSMACOM-879)

(cherry picked from commit 3fd7f0c)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants