Improve Documentation for Registering Workflows to avoid confusion

[sumana-2705]

Tracking issue : #5435

Why are the changes needed?

These changes are necessary to enhance the clarity for first-time users, ensuring they understand how to register workflows without confusion.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Updated note section to remove "Like pyflyte register" in registering_workflows.md file.

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

• All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

[sumana-2705]

Hello @davidmirror-ops

I have changed few lines as mentioned in this issue #5435 by Fabio, Please review these changes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.84%. Comparing base (553a702) to head (122dc67).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5941      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.84%   36.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1309     1309              
  Lines      130967   130967              
==========================================
- Hits        48259    48252       -7     
- Misses      78524    78531       +7     
  Partials     4184     4184              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.12% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests-flytecopilot	11.73% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl	62.40% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteidl	6.92% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.64% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller	43.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib	55.39% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[davidmirror-ops]

Thank you

[welcome]

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉