Support firebase

[ThomasKientz]

Currently we can't use this plugin with serverless GCP (or Firebase).

As explained here fastify/fastify#946 (comment) and in the doc for firebase, we need to use req.rawBody in order to parse files from multipart.

[Uzlopak]

the tests are not happy

[gurgunday]

Decorate that new assignment to req please

[ThomasKientz]

the tests are not happy

@Uzlopak don't really understand why it's failing, looks good but return exit code 1

[Uzlopak]

The test coverage is Not 100%

[climba03003]

Where is payload.rawBody comes from?
I don't like the current idea to support one serverless environment and adding extra branching.

Instead one should provide a plugin that dedicated for the serverless environment and add all the necessary patching to match how Node.js works.

[Uzlopak]

Well the problem is, that gcf is a glorified express router. So they preparse the body so that you dont have to. You get the body stream in rawBody. So maybe we need, like you suggest, a plugin which basically removes the default content type parsers and just assigns rawbody to body?!

[climba03003]

What's comes my mind is something like?

function gcp(fastify) {
  // add pass through content-type parser
  fastify.addContentTypeParser('application/json', {}, (req, body, done) => {
    done(null, body.body);
  });
  
  // add stream transform for multipart when neccessary
  if (fastify.hasContentTypeParser('multipart/form-data')) {
    fastify.addHook('preParsing', function(request, reply, payload, done) {
      if(request.headers['content-type'].startsWith('multipart/form-data')) {
        // we override the `.pipe` method and return rawBody as new payload
        const pipe = request.raw.pipe
        request.raw.pipe = function(stream) {
          Readable.from([rawBody]).pipe(stream)
        }
        request.raw.originalPipe = pipe
        done(null, payload.rawBody)
      } else {
        done(null, payload)
      }
    })
  }
}

[ThomasKientz]

Should I pursue the current implementation of this pull request and add test coverage? @Uzlopak

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.