ci: Update CI and add Code Coverage

[bconn98]

No description provided.

[estk]

Action-rs is archived. Suggest dtolnays action. Check out our situation in trace4rs. I think that's the way to do it until we understand the future of actions-rs.

[bconn98]

Treat this as a draft for now. I don't love that coverage has to go outside the PR.

[bconn98]

Understood that action-rs was deprecated recently, but at this time I don't see a better alternative. I swapped the toolchain checkout though.

[estk]

Suggestions:
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/editorconfig-checker-action

https://github.com/dtolnay/rust-toolchain to install cargo, clippy fmt etc, then just:

    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
      - run: cargo test --all-features
      - run: cargo nextest --all-features
      - run: cargo clippy 
      - run: cargo fmt
      - etc etc

[bconn98]

@estk Hmm seems that both our configs and the github actions configs aren't processed well by the editor config. Situations such as

- kind: threshold
  level: error

can't be processed properly because the indent level isn't a multiple of 4. Do we want to disable the check for yaml files? I can do some further research to see if we can work around it another way.

[estk]

I think we just need to fix the files.

[bconn98]

I think we just need to fix the files.

@estk What I'm saying is that we would need to define a new configuration format (and the gitlab actions format) to fix the job. When I try to fix the indentation locally and run the unit tests I see the following:

---- config::raw::test::full_deserialize stdout ----
thread 'config::raw::test::full_deserialize' panicked at src/config/raw.rs:492:63:
called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Error { kind: SCANNER, problem: "mapping values are not allowed in this context", problem_mark: Mark { line: 9, column: 18 } }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace

[bconn98]

@estk Looks like the final action is setting up the main repo for codecov.io which I can't do

[codecov-commenter]

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once merged to your default branch, Codecov will compare your coverage reports and display the results in this comment.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

[estk]

Hey @bconn98 , thanks for this, I think we're in the home stretch.

Regarding raw.rs

This will be a recurring problem for yaml files that are embedded in rust files. I think one way we can fix this permanently is to disable indentation checks for .rs files since it will already be covered by rustfmt.

[*.rs]
indent_size = false

See editorconfig-checker/editorconfig-checker#98

[bconn98]

@estk done