Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

smspec_node is_historical has false positives #708

Open
asnyv opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

smspec_node is_historical has false positives #708

asnyv opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@asnyv
Copy link
Contributor

asnyv commented Apr 24, 2020

Currently only checks if vector ends with H.
Several examples of vectors which return true, but should return false, exist,. e.g.: MONTH and TCPUH.

History is defined through keywords WCONHIST and WCONINJH, hence vectors that are not of ecl_smspec_var_type: ECL_SMSPEC_WELL_VAR, ECL_SMSPEC_GROUP_VAR or ECL_SMSPEC_FIELD_VAR should not be possible as far as I know.

Checking vector ecl_smspec_var_type should therefore reduce the risk of false positives.

@pinkwah
Copy link
Collaborator

pinkwah commented Dec 17, 2020

Is this still relevant? Looks a lot like #707 . It'd be nice to have documentation of how to detect historical data.

@asnyv
Copy link
Contributor Author

asnyv commented Dec 17, 2020

It is somewhat related to, but not addressed in #707 @dotfloat

@pinkwah
Copy link
Collaborator

pinkwah commented Dec 17, 2020

Cool. Does ECLIPSE have any documentation of what constitutes historical data? Or is this a naming convention and we just have to guess?

@asnyv
Copy link
Contributor Author

asnyv commented Dec 17, 2020

I haven't seen a clear definition, on the other hand: I must admit I haven't read the whole thing 😬🙈 But as I mention above, as far as I know, only field, group and well vectors can be historical (potentially also completions, but I don't think so). And the keyword part will always end on an H like the current implementation (afaik). So my suggestion is to reduce risk of false positives by only checking the types above.
But I would love for someone with years of experience with Eclipse vectors to verify that they haven't seen historical vectors of other types before we conclude on the matter 😅

My suggested (maybe not completely a) solution should of course be easy to implement.

@pinkwah
Copy link
Collaborator

pinkwah commented Dec 17, 2020

Poking @markusdregi , @eivindsm , et al.

@eivindjahren eivindjahren added the christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review label Dec 13, 2024
@eivindjahren eivindjahren added bug and removed christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review labels Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants