Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/update #6

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Feature/update #6

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

mn13
Copy link
Collaborator

@mn13 mn13 commented Jul 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Upgraded the @stellar/stellar-sdk dependency to the latest version, enhancing functionality and performance.
    • Introduced a new ReserveConfiguration interface, improving the detail and structure of reserve data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified the liquidate function by removing an unnecessary boolean parameter, potentially improving its usability.
  • Chores

    • Restructured the scripts section in the package file for better organization.

@mn13 mn13 self-assigned this Jul 31, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Walkthrough

This update focuses on enhancing the codebase through dependency upgrades, particularly for @stellar/stellar-sdk, and improvements in the structure of the liquidate function and reserve data models. The adjustments streamline function calls and introduce a new interface for reserve configuration, enriching the data representation and improving code maintainability.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated @stellar/stellar-sdk from ^11.2.1 to ^12.1.0 and restructured the scripts section.
src/infrastructure/soroban/contracts.ts Removed a boolean argument from the call function in the liquidate method, simplifying its invocation.
src/infrastructure/soroban/types.ts Introduced ReserveConfiguration interface, updated PoolReserveData to include new properties and replace the old structure.

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where code does play,
Changes hop in, brightening the day.
Dependencies fresh, like dew on the grass,
Functions simplified, making time pass!
With data enriched, oh what a delight,
Let's celebrate progress, all shiny and bright! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mn13 mn13 requested a review from artur-abliazimov July 31, 2024 07:58
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 962cbc0 and db5c576.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/infrastructure/soroban/contracts.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/infrastructure/soroban/types.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • package.json
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/infrastructure/soroban/types.ts (2)

6-13: LGTM! The ReserveConfiguration interface is well-defined.

The interface encapsulates several properties related to reserve configuration with appropriate property types.


16-23: LGTM! The PoolReserveData interface is well-defined.

The interface now includes a configuration property of type ReserveConfiguration and several new numerical properties, enriching the data representation.

src/infrastructure/soroban/contracts.ts (1)

39-39: Verify the removal of the boolean argument from the call function.

The removal of the boolean argument simplifies the function call. Ensure the removal aligns with the intended behavior and does not affect the underlying logic.

Verification successful

Let's correct the file type and re-run the search for the call function usage within TypeScript files.


Verified the removal of the boolean argument from the call function.

The call function now uses variadic arguments, which aligns with the intended behavior and does not affect the underlying logic.

  • src/infrastructure/soroban/contracts.ts - The call function signature has been updated to accept a variable number of arguments.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the changes in the `call` function usage.

# Test: Search for the `call` function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type python -A 5 $'call'

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the changes in the `call` function usage.

# Test: Search for the `call` function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'call'

Length of output: 3790

@mn13 mn13 merged commit 4a4f181 into master Jul 31, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@artur-abliazimov artur-abliazimov deleted the feature/update branch July 31, 2024 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants