Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: also change DATABASE_ID to ELECTRIC_DATABASE_ID #1934

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

KyleAMathews
Copy link
Contributor

Missed this when working on #1927

@KyleAMathews KyleAMathews requested a review from kevin-dp November 5, 2024 22:05
Copy link
Contributor

@thruflo thruflo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I observe that we don't have this env var documented yet. Which is fine as we don't have any multi-tenancy documentation yet.

Do the potential re-factoring changes that @magnetised and @kevin-dp are discussing impact anything around the API for multi-tenancy? Or are we able to document the usage when we want to?

@KyleAMathews
Copy link
Contributor Author

We can merge this now & they can then change it / add docs when they get to it.

@KyleAMathews KyleAMathews merged commit d34cb7e into main Nov 6, 2024
23 checks passed
@KyleAMathews KyleAMathews deleted the db-id branch November 6, 2024 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants