Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename view to layout and adjust spacing #1075

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member

See commits. In terms of review, the first commit doesn't need to be code-reviewed at all. I think basically all bugs I could introduce there are caught by type checking.

We just noticed that "view" might not be the best name. Previously it
wasn't that important but now that it was mentioned in a soon to be
immutable DB migration, we wanted to fix it. This commit is just
renaming, and not doing anything else.
I think it looks better with a bit more breathing room.
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt added the changelog:nope Not worth mentioning in the changelog label Jan 16, 2024
@LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member Author

Same as with the original PR by Gregor: we can ignore the failing admin UI check.

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to test-deployment-pr1075 January 16, 2024 09:32 Destroyed
@owi92 owi92 merged commit 1caf859 into elan-ev:master Jan 16, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt deleted the rename-view-to-layout branch January 16, 2024 10:03
@geichelberger
Copy link
Contributor

The last options are already called layout shouldn't they be renamed as well?

grafik
grafik

@LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member Author

Good catch, yep the label should be renamed. Will do

@owi92
Copy link
Member

owi92 commented Jan 16, 2024

Whoops, only looked at the german version just now. Time for a coffee 🤦

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:nope Not worth mentioning in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants