Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed up CI some more #1069

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

LukasKalbertodt
Copy link
Member

See commits. This should be it for now.

@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt added area:ci Continuous Integration changelog:nope Not worth mentioning in the changelog labels Jan 10, 2024
Our master builds were pretty slow because our release builds are slow.
So this introduces a new profile which is basically the same as release
(still embedding assets, for example), but a lot faster. Some numbers
on my machine:

release
- fresh build: 2:21
- touch & build: 1:50
- test after build: 0:28

release-ci
- fresh build: 1:08
- touch & build: 0:31
- test after build: 0:17
There is almost no shared data between those.
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt force-pushed the speed-up-ci-master-more branch from 6daa0aa to e8bf44e Compare January 10, 2024 16:22
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt marked this pull request as ready for review January 10, 2024 16:23
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to test-deployment-pr1069 January 10, 2024 16:30 Destroyed
Copy link
Member

@owi92 owi92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fingers crossed 🤞

@owi92 owi92 merged commit 2772693 into elan-ev:master Jan 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@LukasKalbertodt LukasKalbertodt deleted the speed-up-ci-master-more branch January 11, 2024 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:ci Continuous Integration changelog:nope Not worth mentioning in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants