Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create sonarcloud.yml #536

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create sonarcloud.yml #536

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eGovMan
Copy link

@eGovMan eGovMan commented Sep 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for automated SonarCloud analysis, enhancing code quality and security.
    • The workflow triggers on specific events, ensuring timely analysis during development.
    • Provides guidance for users to set up and configure the analysis with SonarCloud.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow named SonarCloud analysis has been added to automate code analysis using SonarCloud. This workflow triggers on pushes to specific branches and pull requests targeting the master branch. It includes a job for code analysis that utilizes the SonarCloud GitHub Action, requiring a stored token for authentication. The setup process is outlined, and placeholders for project-specific configurations are provided.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml Added a new workflow for SonarCloud analysis, including job configuration and setup instructions.

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop with delight,
A new path for analysis, shining so bright.
With SonarCloud's help, our code will be clear,
Bugs and vulnerabilities, we’ll banish from here!
So let’s dance through the branches, with joy and with cheer,
For clean, quality code is what we hold dear! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml (1)

29-37: Misalignment in Workflow Branch Configuration

The branches 2.9-LTS, 2.8, and develop specified in the workflow configuration do not exist in the repository. Only the master branch is present. Please update the workflow configuration to align with the actual branch structure of the project.

  • Workflow file: .github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml
  • Branches to review: 2.9-LTS, 2.8, develop
Analysis chain

Review the workflow trigger configuration.

The workflow is configured to trigger on pushes to multiple branches (master, 2.9-LTS, 2.8, develop) and pull requests to the master branch, as well as manually via workflow_dispatch. This setup ensures that the analysis runs on important branches and can be manually triggered when necessary. Verify that these branches align with your project's branch strategy.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the branches configured in the workflow are aligned with the project's branch strategy.

# Test: List all branches in the repository. Expect: The branches listed in the workflow should be present.
git branch -a

Length of output: 104


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all remote branches to verify if the branches configured in the workflow exist on the remote repository.

git branch -r

Length of output: 62

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fcedf3 and b3ddc3f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/sonarcloud.yml (3)

1-4: Review the introductory comments regarding third-party actions.

The comments clearly state that the actions used are not certified by GitHub and are provided by a third-party. This is an important disclaimer for security and compliance purposes. Ensure that the use of these third-party actions is acceptable within your project's governance framework.


6-28: Review the workflow description and setup instructions.

The comments provide a detailed guide on how to set up and use SonarCloud with GitHub Actions. It includes steps for linking SonarCloud to a GitHub account, importing projects, and configuring analysis methods. These instructions are valuable for users unfamiliar with SonarCloud, enhancing the maintainability and usability of the workflow.


38-40: Review the permissions configuration.

The workflow is configured with pull-requests: read permission, which allows SonarCloud to decorate pull requests with analysis results. This is a minimal permission setting that adheres to the principle of least privilege, enhancing the security of the workflow.

Comment on lines +41 to +67
jobs:
Analysis:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Analyze with SonarCloud

# You can pin the exact commit or the version.
# uses: SonarSource/[email protected]
uses: SonarSource/sonarcloud-github-action@4006f663ecaf1f8093e8e4abb9227f6041f52216
env:
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }} # Generate a token on Sonarcloud.io, add it to the secrets of this repo with the name SONAR_TOKEN (Settings > Secrets > Actions > add new repository secret)
with:
# Additional arguments for the SonarScanner CLI
args:
# Unique keys of your project and organization. You can find them in SonarCloud > Information (bottom-left menu)
# mandatory
-Dsonar.projectKey=
-Dsonar.organization=
# Comma-separated paths to directories containing main source files.
#-Dsonar.sources= # optional, default is project base directory
# Comma-separated paths to directories containing test source files.
#-Dsonar.tests= # optional. For more info about Code Coverage, please refer to https://docs.sonarcloud.io/enriching/test-coverage/overview/
# Adds more detail to both client and server-side analysis logs, activating DEBUG mode for the scanner, and adding client-side environment variables and system properties to the server-side log of analysis report processing.
#-Dsonar.verbose= # optional, default is false
# When you need the analysis to take place in a directory other than the one from which it was launched, default is .
projectBaseDir: .
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review the job configuration and steps.

The job is configured to run on ubuntu-latest and includes steps to analyze the code with SonarCloud using a specific commit of the SonarCloud GitHub Action. The use of a specific commit hash (4006f663ecaf1f8093e8e4abb9227f6041f52216) instead of a version tag (v2.2.0) can be seen as a best practice to ensure stability and reproducibility of the workflow. However, ensure that this commit hash is the intended one and that it points to a stable and secure version of the action.

The environment variable SONAR_TOKEN is correctly configured to use a secret, which is a secure way to handle sensitive information. The configuration of the SonarScanner CLI arguments is left incomplete (-Dsonar.projectKey= and -Dsonar.organization=), which needs to be addressed before this workflow can be functional.

Consider adding default values or instructions on how to set these properties if they are not meant to be left empty.

Consider adding default values or instructions on how to set these properties if they are not meant to be left empty. This will prevent potential configuration errors and ensure the workflow is functional out-of-the-box.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant