Release 0.13.0

[etiennebacher]

Close #543

[strengejacke]

Maybe wait for #548, so this package makes it into the book :-)
Should be implemented in a few minutes.

[etiennebacher]

Sure, no worries ;)

[strengejacke]

ok, done.

[strengejacke]

(sorry, I added a wrong snapshot test, updated the testfile now)

[etiennebacher]

Submitted

[etiennebacher]

package datawizard_0.13.0.tar.gz has been auto-processed. The auto-check found problems when checking the first order strong reverse dependencies.
Please reply-all and explain: Is this expected or do you need to fix anything in your package? If expected, have all maintainers of affected packages been informed well in advance? Are there false positives in our results?

*** Changes to worse in reverse dependencies ***
Debian: [<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/reverseDependencies/summary.txt>](https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/reverseDependencies/summary.txt)
correlation, parameters

Log dir: [<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/>](https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/)
The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.

Pretests:
Windows: [<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/Windows/00check.log>](https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/Windows/00check.log)
Debian: [<https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/Debian/00check.log>](https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/datawizard_0.13.0_20241003_104430/Debian/00check.log)

Last published version on CRAN:

CRAN Web: [<https://cran.r-project.org/package=datawizard>](https://cran.r-project.org/package=datawizard)

Best regards,
CRAN teams' auto-check service
Package check result: OK

Changes to worse in reverse depends:

Package: correlation
Check: tests
New result: ERROR
    Running ‘testthat.R’ [19s/19s]
  Running the tests in ‘tests/testthat.R’ failed.
  Complete output:
    > library(testthat)
    > library(correlation)
    >
    > test_check("correlation")

    [ FAIL 6 | WARN 149 | SKIP 13 | PASS 117 ]

    ══ Skipped tests (13) ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
    • On CRAN (13): 'test-as.list.r:7:3', 'test-cormatrix_to_excel.r:3:3',
      'test-cormatrix_to_excel.r:16:3', 'test-correlation.r:172:3',
      'test-correlation.r:195:3', 'test-display_print_dataframe.r:2:3',
      'test-display_print_dataframe.r:14:3', 'test-display_print_matrix.r:4:3',
      'test-display_print_matrix.r:13:3', 'test-display_print_matrix.r:31:3',
      'test-methods.r:9:3', 'test-renaming.r:3:3',
      'test-selecting_variables.r:28:3'

    ══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:110:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    c(nrow(summary(out, redundant = TRUE)), ncol(summary(out, redundant = TRUE))) (`actual`) not identical to c(7L, 8L) (`expected`).

      `actual`: 5 6
    `expected`: 7 8
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:111:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    c(nrow(summary(out)), ncol(summary(out))) (`actual`) not identical to c(6L, 7L) (`expected`).

      `actual`: 4 5
    `expected`: 6 7
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:113:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    `out <- correlation(iris, method = "auto", include_factors = TRUE)` did not throw the expected message.
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:117:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    c(nrow(summary(out, redundant = TRUE)), ncol(summary(out, redundant = TRUE))) (`actual`) not identical to c(7L, 8L) (`expected`).

      `actual`: 5 6
    `expected`: 7 8
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:118:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    c(nrow(summary(out)), ncol(summary(out))) (`actual`) not identical to c(6L, 7L) (`expected`).

      `actual`: 4 5
    `expected`: 6 7
    ── Failure ('test-correlation.r:120:3'): format checks ─────────────────────────
    all(...) is not TRUE

    `actual`:   FALSE
    `expected`: TRUE

    [ FAIL 6 | WARN 149 | SKIP 13 | PASS 117 ]
    Error: Test failures
    Execution halted

Package: parameters
Check: examples
New result: ERROR
  Running examples in ‘parameters-Ex.R’ failed
  The error most likely occurred in:

  > base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")
  > ### Name: reduce_parameters
  > ### Title: Dimensionality reduction (DR) / Features Reduction
  > ### Aliases: reduce_parameters reduce_data
  >
  > ### ** Examples
  >
  > data(iris)
  > model <- lm(Sepal.Width ~ Species * Sepal.Length + Petal.Width, data = iris)
  > model

  Call:
  lm(formula = Sepal.Width ~ Species * Sepal.Length + Petal.Width,
      data = iris)

  Coefficients:
                     (Intercept)               Speciesversicolor
                         -0.4731                          1.2981
                Speciesvirginica                    Sepal.Length
                          1.2252                          0.7515
                     Petal.Width  speciesversicolor:Sepal.Length
                          0.5662                         -0.5503
   speciesvirginica:Sepal.Length
                         -0.5883

  > reduce_parameters(model)
  Error in eval(predvars, data, env) :
    object 'Petal.Width_0.98/Species_0.96/Sepal.Length_0.91' not found
  Calls: reduce_parameters ... eval -> <Anonymous> -> model.frame.default -> eval -> eval
  Execution halted

[etiennebacher]

I think #547 may have caused failures in revdeps that I forgot to check because I ran it already when I opened this PR...

[etiennebacher]

I'll rerun revdepcheck but if all failures are in easystats packages, I can just tell them that maintainers are aware and will update their packages?

[strengejacke]

I don't think you need to run revdep again, as CRAN has done this already. Let me check correlation, if this something we need to address in datawizard or not. Else, just go ahead and say that these are expected and we're prepared to fix issues.

[etiennebacher]

I think you just need to add dummy_factors = TRUE in correlation:::.clean_data()

[strengejacke]

Yes. just saw it and opened a PR.

[etiennebacher]

Great, I see you already fixed the issue in parameters as well, thanks! I'll answer them that those failures are known and that we will submit updates for them in the next few weeks

[etiennebacher]

0.13.0 is on CRAN