-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 0.10.0 #490
Release 0.10.0 #490
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #490 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.66% 90.73% +0.06%
==========================================
Files 74 75 +1
Lines 5765 5805 +40
==========================================
+ Hits 5227 5267 +40
Misses 538 538 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
You can run revdep checks using base R, that worked for me. I can post the script later |
copy the source file into the specified directory and then run the script: tools::check_packages_in_dir(
dir = "c:/Users/Daniel/Documents/GitHub/revdep_check/",
check_args = c("--as-cran", ""),
reverse = list(repos = getOption("repos")["CRAN"])
) |
I don't think it's able to tell whether there are new errors, right? Currently I have some errors in |
Not sure, it tells you whether any of the reverse dependency checks failed. I used this to check performance when I had problems with the revdep package |
If not too late, we could wait for #493 |
Yes I'll include #493 in this release |
Submitted |
Close #489
Unable to run
revdepcheck
locally (and maybe on CI too) due to r-lib/revdepcheck#376