Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARM64-SVE: Add
TrigonometricSelectCoefficient
,TrigonometricStartingValue
#104681ARM64-SVE: Add
TrigonometricSelectCoefficient
,TrigonometricStartingValue
#104681Changes from all commits
3adeb81
17384f2
5bb50e7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we sure we are taking into account all the possibilities of the operation? https://docsmirror.github.io/A64/2023-06/shared_pseudocode.html#impl-shared.FPMul.3? @SwapnilGaikwad, can we double check this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic in the helper function is correct for the valid input (-π/4 < x <= π/4). However, behaviour of the instruction may be undefined if the input falls outside the valid range.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@amanasifkhalid - for our testing purpose, we would certainly fall out of valid range. how does the API behave for them? wondering if test is robust enough to not fail for invalid values or we at least handle them?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've verified we are generating out-of-range values, though the tests are still passing. I can constrain the inputs to this test to ensure we don't go out of range to avoid potential undefined behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's interesting. so undefined could be that sometime they will pass and sometime they won't.
Or probably constaint the validation for only the lanes that had valid inputs? that way we will still have coverage for invalid values, which realistically someone can pass in?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That sounds like a better idea. I'll update the validation logic to do this.