tmp-gh-action-pr-context

A quick playground to solve the problem of extracting the data from the .context of PR-related Github actions once and for all.

Executive Summary

Leaving PR comments, both per individual changed files and overall for the PR, is doable.

This requires a custom Github token with special permissions, "Pull Requests" and "Discussions".

There are several pieces of ugliness to work through. The most notable ones are:

• The "calling convention" of how the per-PR Github action is invoked is quite different between the "PR opened" trigger and the "new commit added to an existing PR" trigger.
• Collecting the data required to leave the comment is nontrivial. Some of it is not even in the context. provided.
• The "line must be part of the diff" error is real, and the only way to tell which lines are parts of the diff is to parse the .patch body. This error can "just" be caught and ignored though.

Token Setup

In order for the runner of the Github action to be able to comment on pull requests, a token with elevated permissions has to be created.

(Why a default GITHUB_TOKEN from the runner of the action is insufficient to leave PR comments is beyond me.)

TL;DR:

• "Setting -> Developer Settings", link.
• "Personal Access Tokens" -> Fine-grained tokens (Beta)", link.
• Generate new token.
• Enter OTP if you have it configured (and you better do!)
• "Only select repositories" -> Choose this particular repository.
• "Repository permission" -> "Pull Requests" -> "Read and write".
• "Repository permission" -> "Discussions" -> "Read and write".
• "Generate Token", and save it somewhere temporarily.
• Now go to this repo's settings, link to this repo, change accordingly.
• "Secrets and variables" -> "Actions".
• "New repository secret".
• Name: COMMENTING_GITHUB_TOKEN, value: the freshly created token.

PR1

Testing the initial action.

The hash of PR1 commit1 is 876f123f51efe07e99c87209fe5f01692b37b099.

The hash of PR1 commit2 is 4d9540e555f92800d237d012d732f138f60397b8.

From the first action run:

cat c1.json | jq .eventName
"pull_request"

cat c1.json | jq .payload.number
1

cat c1.json | jq .payload.action
"opened"

cat c1.json | jq .payload.pull_request.head.sha
"876f123f51efe07e99c87209fe5f01692b37b099"

From the second action run:

cat c2.json | jq .eventName
"pull_request"

cat c2.json | jq .payload.number
1

cat c2.json | jq .payload.action
"synchronize"

cat c2.json | jq .payload.after
"4d9540e555f92800d237d012d732f138f60397b8"

Lessons learned from PR1:

1. There are indeed differences between "opened" and "synchronize".
2. The HEAD commit is totally broken, may be related to (3).
3. Need to upgrade the version of actions/checkout@v2, and need to properly do a shallow clone.

PR2

Testing with v3 of actions/checkout.

The hash of PR2 commit1 is 2d7a6e2c4970be5cd68f9d9776b46a2e688c0ad8.

The hash of PR2 commit2 is e5d43879a4e32fc39769b765ceb0587719fc705a.

From the first action run:

cat c1.json | jq .eventName
"pull_request"

cat c1.json | jq .payload.number
2

cat c1.json | jq .payload.action
"opened"

cat c1.json | jq .payload.pull_request.head.sha
"2d7a6e2c4970be5cd68f9d9776b46a2e688c0ad8"

From the second action run:

cat c2.json | jq .eventName
"pull_request"

cat c2.json | jq .payload.number
2

cat c2.json | jq .payload.action
"synchronize"

cat c2.json | jq .payload.after
"e5d43879a4e32fc39769b765ceb0587719fc705a"

Lessons learned from PR2:

1. Need to change s/base/head/ for "opened".
2. The v3 of the actions/checkout action yields no warnings.

PR3

Testing end-to-end, fingers crossed.

From the first action run, the commit ID is correct: fb1c24d1d9d474f281886732d84f80397922c733.

From the second action run, the commit ID is correct: 8ccc473c4f413ba092c303a518a43846bf546e55.

Lessons learned from PR3:

• This seems to work!

PR4

Trying the shallow clone for real.

Verdict: fetch-depth of 1 is indeed the shallow clone.

The SHA of the HEAD commit is still off, but PRs one to three took care of this.

PR5

Trying top-level commenting on PRs with a COMMENTING_GITHUB_TOKEN Github secret.

Lessons learned from PR5:

• ${{ github.repository_owner }} is still the best way to get the owner. :-(
• Just "Discussions" is not enough permissions for the PAT token, adding "Pull Requests".

PR6

A clean test for top-level PR comments.

Initial comment, on PR creation: check.

Second comment, on the new commit added: check.

PR7

Trying per-file PR comments as well.

Lessons learned from PR7:

1. It's enough to have two permissions, "Pull Requests", and "Discussions".
2. The "pull_request_review_thread.line must be part of the diff" error is real. It can be ignored though.

PR8

A clean test. And it passed! Now humbly testing in a different PR from another Github account of mine ...